Cialis online Clomid online Viagra online

Posts Tagged ‘Halton’

Milton Town Council Meetings should be streamed

January 20th, 2010
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

From Zeeshan Hamid:

spacer

Continue reading “Web-stream these meetings already!”

spacer

You can read Zeeshan Hamid’s blog here

spacer

Comments on this story are moderated

Did you get ‘the phone call?’

January 18th, 2010
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

At 5:00 am this past Saturday morning, the phones rang out at the offices of MiltonSearch.com, waking everyone from their slumber.

The reason for this 5am wake-up call? Well, it was an automated message from Halton District School Board letting us know that indeed, classes and field trips were cancelled for the day due to inclement weather.

It’s worth mentioning again that it was a Saturday morning and after running to the window to see what kind of winter storm we were experiencing, there was absolutely no snow to speak of.

Later in the day — after waking up on my own — whilst perusing the Hawthorne Villager discussion forums, I realized we weren’t the only lucky ones who received this early wake-up call.

School trustee Donna Danielli later posted the following apology in the thread:

I am so very sorry for the glitch in our system which sent 5 am phone calls out to all of our houses this morning.

Technology is great when it works, but when it doesn’t….grrrr!

Again, my apologies to all who disturbed so early on a weekend. Please know that the Board tech department is investigating and hopefully it won’t happen again.

Donna Danielli
Public School Trustee
daniellid@hdsb.ca

and this:

Again, I cannot apologize enough for those who were disturbed so early this morning. Our head of IT sent out the following explanations for those who are curious how it happened:

This message was sent in error. It occurred as a result of testing updates to the system. I.T staff did not double check the cancellation of a test message. This resulted in the system sending the message you received.

We take this situation very seriously. We apologize for waking households and for delivering an incorrect message. We apologize for undermining the value of the Home Notification System and will work to ensure this never happens again.

And then Sunday, I came across this article in the Toronto Star, realizing that this wasn’t limited to Milton — thousands of families across Halton received the call. Apparently ‘the call’ also made the airwaves on 680News later in the day.

Now, as bothersome as it was to be unexpectedly awakened early on a Saturday morning, it’s hard to imagine how this ended up as front page news in the Sunday Star. Slow news day or what?

Let’s keep this in perspective folks — it was just a phone call. These kinds of technical glitches happen — albeit not too often — but they happen. It’s not the end of the world.

To Donna Danielli: thank you for responding to the online posters and apologizing, although I’m pretty sure you didn’t have to and it definitely wasn’t your fault.

And what about us? Were we annoyed? Well, yes — but it’s good to know the school board’s new automated phone alert system is obviously operational, date issues aside.

Granted, our children stayed sound asleep and snuggled in their beds during all of this. If that wasn’t the case, well, I think this post would have had a slightly different tone.

Chill, people.

Comments on this story are moderated

Halton looking to protect 36% of its developable land

December 17th, 2009
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

Burlington farmer James Fisher says a natural heritage designation will inevitably put agricultural interests behind environmental concerns.

Burlington farmer James Fisher says a natural heritage designation will inevitably put agricultural interests behind environmental concerns.

Kudos to Halton Region, which is finally looking to limit development after a huge amount of some of Ontario’s finest farmland has already been or is planned to be developed on.

This will be interesting to watch as the situation pits green politicians vs. rural politicians supporting farmers vs. farmers who want to sell their land to developers vs. farmers who want to preserve Halton’s rich farmland.

You may also want to read two other articles posted previously on MiltonSearch.com: Strawberry Fields (not) Forever and A Farewell to Farms.

Below is an overview of Halton Region and its land designations. Click the image for an enlarged, interactive version.

Here is this latest column in it’s entirety from the Toronto Star:

Where Homes Don’t Grow

Halton’s radical plan to limit development pits red-taped farmers against green politicians

Outspoken Oakville councillor Allan Elgar has a name for the practice of building a sprawling subdivision on prime farmland: He calls it “the final crop.”

That’s why the farmboy-turned-environmentalist is backing Halton Region’s groundbreaking proposal to set its own protections on an extensive natural heritage system. The plan would preserve a whopping 36 per cent of the region’s developable land, set up an integrated network of preserved areas, and drastically curtail where houses can be planted some day.

The land included is neither part of the protected greenbelt and Niagara Escarpment nor under consideration for development.

But the move is pitting green-minded politicians in Oakville and Burlington against those in Halton Hills and Milton, who are more responsive to concerns raised by farmers and development interests and have opposed it. A final vote is slated for Dec. 16.

Supporters make no bones about the fact the plan will thwart speculators who have bought, or arranged to buy, vast hectares of prime agricultural land in Halton, and the farmers who want to sell it.

Caught in the crossfire, however, are farmers who don’t want to sell but are deeply concerned that the new designation will add another layer of regulation that bodes ill for farming in the long run.

It is, contends James Fisher, all about how words are interpreted.

“The actual designation has negative impact,” said Fisher, one of several farmers who spoke to Halton regional council this week. “It’s not that we are against the natural heritage system. We want an alternative that respects agriculture.”

They fear that replacing the current agricultural zoning with the term “natural heritage” will inevitably put farming interests behind environmental concerns, despite repeated assurances that farming will always be allowed.

Farmers want, at a minimum, to see the natural heritage system designated as preserving both environmental features and agriculture.

Whatever the final wording, Elgar and most of the Halton councillors seem ready to approve the creation of a vast “systems-based” network of natural heritage corridors to connect environmentally sensitive areas such as river valleys, woodlots and wetlands.

It would end the old practice of protecting only isolated pockets, which tend to degrade over time if there are no corridors ensuring that wildlife can move freely.

The proposal may be more radical than the provincial greenbelt legislation because it bans golf courses anywhere on the system, whereas the province just blocks golf courses from prime agricultural land.

“If we get this, we will be the first region in the Greater Toronto Area with a systems-based approach on a regional basis,” said Elgar, describing the preservation plan as simply an extra layer of protection.

“It is a no-touch zone … There is concern that there is a lot of farming land bought by the development industry, with the hope in future of flipping it to plant houses.”

The plan would not only make protected areas off-limits but also make anything built within 120 metres of a natural heritage feature or corridor subject to an environmental impact assessment – a proposition feared both by developers and farmers who want to make improvements to their property.

While other GTA municipalities are also doing more long-range development planning now, Halton’s scheme is the most ambitious.

In the face of similar opposition, Peel Region politicians recently deferred a decision on their own plan, which targets mostly farmland in Brampton and Caledon. Peel’s plan is less stringent than Halton’s – it has been slammed by the Sierra Club for example, for allowing golf courses to be built in the valley lands of its waterways.

Halton politicians could take courage from an Ontario Municipal Board ruling last year that approved Oakville’s controversial decision to protect 900 hectares on its own initiative. The preservation area – won after a decade-long tussle with the development industry – represents more than one-third of the 3,400 hectares of undeveloped land north of Dundas St. W.

The OMB ruling was a major victory for the likes of Elgar, Oakville Mayor Rob Burton and members of the environmental group Oakvillegreen, who had fought to preserve green space in north Oakville while making room for an eventual population of more than 50,000.

The ruling also emboldened them and other Halton Region politicians to go after developers for thousands of dollars in extra development charges on each home sold – significantly higher than other regions – under the mantra that “growth must pay for itself” and municipal government doesn’t exist to subsidize developer profits.

Halton Hills Councillor Clark Sommerville says the intention behind the natural heritage system proposal is good – and driven by urban councillors from Oakville and Burlington who are trying to make amends for the fact their communities were largely built out before such protections existed.

But he thinks it’s “overkill.”

No matter how well-intentioned, overregulation “will be the death knell of farming,” Somerville said – not development.

“The biggest thing we are trying to protect is the non-urban rural land from development, but the way it’s being written it almost appears that agriculture is the threat,” he said.

Still, environmentalists such as Liz Benneian of Oakvillegreen say the new rules will ensure protection for farmers. Her only concern is that a provision in the original plan – superimposing the natural heritage system on Greenbelt areas as a second layer of protection against a future change of heart by the province – has since been removed.

“We believe this is a forward-thinking plan from planners and politicians,” Benneian said. “A gift to our grandchildren.”

Comments on this story are moderated

2009 Milton Volunteer Fair

September 24th, 2009
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

The 2009 Milton Volunteer Fair takes place Saturday, October 24th, 2009 at the Milton Sports Centre on Santa Maria Blvd.

The 2009 Milton Volunteer Fair takes place Saturday, October 24th, 2009 at the Milton Sports Centre on Santa Maria Blvd (click image to open pdf document).

From Big Brothers Big Sisters of Halton:

Are you looking for hands-on experience to link to your academic plans? Do you want to find ways to explore future careers and add valuable experience to your resume? Are you interested in the rewards of getting involved in your community?

Well now is the time.

The annual Milton Volunteer Fair is slated for Saturday October 24 from 10 a.m. until 1 p.m. at the Milton Sport Centre, 605 Santa Maria Boulevard. The Fair is an excellent way of providing local residents with an opportunity to speak with community organizations and find out more about how they can gain experience in a variety of fields. Rather than searching through the internet, pounding the pavement and knocking on doors, the fair offers a stress-free way to speak to many groups under one roof at one time.

No registration is necessary.

The Milton Volunteer Fair is being organized by representatives from local non-profits, including the Big Brothers Big Sisters of Halton, Milton Community Policing Committee, the Milton Community Resource Centre and Volunteer Halton. The event continues to be a popular way to link potential volunteers with an agency that meets their needs.

For more information please contact Stu Johnston (stujbs@sympatico.ca, (905) 634-5844) or Anne Coburn, Director of Volunteer Halton (acobourn@cdhalton.ca, (905) 878-0955).

Comments on this story are moderated

Uproar in Milton over increased development charges passed on by Mattamy

September 10th, 2009
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

The popular Hawthorne Villager forums are glowing red hot this week as many soon-to-be residents of brand new Mattamy-built homes received their much-anticipated letters from Mattamy announcing details of exactly how much they would have to pay in increased Halton Region development charges. Now that the posts are flying fast and furious, the magic number seems to be $7888.00 no matter the size or price of the home currently under construction.

The full, ongoing discussion can be found here.

The general feeling is that of rage at this point, and I really feel for the new homeowners who have been hit by this unexpected charge. Fortunately for some, they had lawyers with enough foresight or knowledge of the new homebuying process that they had their contracts amended to cap the amount at $1000 — but for most, it’s a huge extra cost out of the blue — money they either don’t have, or were planning to use for their downpayments, upgrades, new appliances or renovations after moving in.

Initially, I looked at Mattamy with my conspiracy theory hat on: they’re taking great pleasure in passing along this increased development charge to their customers — get everyone incensed enough to protest this increase, so maybe it goes away and possibly they increase their profits. Whatever the case, any charge the Region hits them with, you know they’re just passing it down to the customer. It’s what any business would do.

The Region of Halton has also posted a Q&A on their website here, which was an interesting read:

Information for Purchasers of New Mattamy Homes in Milton

Q: Mattamy says they are requiring me to pay about $8,000 before closing to cover a new tax / levy / development charge that has been imposed by Halton. Is that true?

  • No. This cost did not come about due to a new tax, development charge, or levy.
  • It did not come about due to an increase in an existing tax, development charge or levy.
  • The amount Mattamy Homes is referring to relates to a financial contribution that Mattamy agreed, in 2007 and 2008, to make to Halton Region in two installments to pay for key infrastructure to support growth.
  • The amount payable under the agreement is the responsibility of the Mattamy Homes, who now appears to be trying to pass these costs on to you.

Q: This came as a surprise to me. Why am I only hearing about this now?

  • Halton Region was not aware that Mattamy Homes did not communicate with you about the amount of the costs before now.
  • The industry and Halton began discussions about this subject in 2007.
  • The amount of the per unit payment that developers were going to have to make as a contribution was estimated and disclosed publicly in November 2008.
  • Mattamy Homes has known these costs would be payable since 2007, and have known the magnitude of how much it would be since October 2008.
  • There were over 22 meetings and a full consultative process.
  • Mattamy Homes participated fully in the process.

Q: Does Mattamy Homes have the right to pass these charges on to me?

  • Mattamy Homes agreed to pay for the costs of new infrastructure under the agreement that they made with Halton.
  • Whether or not they can now pass that cost on to you is a contractual matter between you and Mattamy Homes.
  • Given that the sum arises from a “payment under an agreement”, and not from a tax, levy or a development charge, you might ask your solicitor if this charge can be appropriately passed on to you under the terms of your agreement of purchase and sale and if the amount under the agreement was fully disclosed to you after November 2008 when the amount of the contribution was estimated and disclosed publicly.

Q: Why did Halton seek contributions from Mattamy Homes and other developers?

  • The contributions arise from the long-standing Council approved policy that existing Halton taxpayers should not pay for the costs of growth.
  • Halton’s Financial and Implementation Plan determines the actual costs of infrastructure, like roads, water and waste water services, and assigns those costs to each new unit.
  • This policy is essential to the long term financial sustainability of Halton.

Q: Can you simply drop the charge or lower it or not apply it to us?

  • No, we cannot do that. Halton’s Financial and Implementation Plan for the 2008/2009 Allocation Program is essential to the long term viability of the Region.
  • Without it, Halton would face a significant shortfall and burden present and future taxpayers.
  • The Plan applies to all new units being constructed in Halton, so there is no ability to make exceptions.

Q: But I can’t afford to pay it. What am I supposed to do?

  • The fee is payable by Mattamy Homes.
  • It appears they have tried to pass them on to you.
  • We recommend that you consult with your legal counsel as to your rights relative to your developer.
  • From the Region’s perspective, they’ve charged Mattamy and it sounds like they feel Mattamy shouldn’t pass this on. As stated above, what did they think Mattamy was going to do? Absorb this cost? At $8000 per home, you don’t need to be a math wiz to figure out that’s a big dollar figure we’re talking about. The Region sure sounds like they’re making Mattamy out to be the bad guy on this one….

    Some think Mattamy should at least have let their customers know about this charge sooner — however, they themselves apparently only found out about what the exact charge would be in April 2009 according to the Region.

    Apparently on September 30th, the Region of Halton will sit down and review a proposal from the builders which may or may not reduce or eliminate this fee.

    Grab the popcorn, this one’s going to get interesting.

    Comments on this story are moderated

    Friends of Milton Hospital

    June 17th, 2009
    Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

    spacer

    Milton Hospital has not seen a substantial expansion since the mid-1980s when the Towns population was less than 30,000. Miltons population is approximately 80,000 as of Spring 2009.

    Milton Hospital has not seen a substantial expansion since the mid-1980's when the Town's population was less than 30,000. Milton's current population is approximately 80,000 (Spring 2009).

    Let the campaign begin – Group launches community campaign in support of hospital expansion

    The massive increase of residents to Milton, combined with the town’s unique proportion of young and growing families, requires a hospital that expands along with the community, according to a local volunteer group committed to securing that expansion.

    “I use the analogy that Milton (District) Hospital is our community mother,” said Cari Kovachik- MacNeil, co-chair of Friends of Milton Hospital, during the official launch of the group’s ‘Help Milton Hospital Grow’ campaign yesterday on the hospital grounds.

    “Our community of Milton is growing, we need our mother to grow with us,” she said.

    The group’s campaign is dedicated to garnering support among the community for the hospital redevelopment and expansion, and showing that support to the Province, from which approval and majority funding are needed for Halton Healthcare Services (HHS) to implement its master plan for hospital growth.

    With $25,000 support from the Town of Milton, the group will hand out buttons among the community and ask residents to sign postcards directed to Ontario Health Minister David Caplan asking for approval for the hospital expansion.

    The current hospital is designed and funded to operate for 32,000 residents, but Milton now has around 80,000 residents. The hospital currently has 68 beds, but can only expand with existing resources and space to 86 beds, which means it will reach capacity by next year, according to HHS.

    One of the most visible impacts of Milton’s residential growth on the hospital is in the maternity ward. Only 216 babies were delivered at the hospital in 2000, just before Milton’s current growth spurt began, but that number is around 1,000 now. In 2016/17, the hospital expects to deliver more than 2,000 babies, a percentage increase far outstripping the town’s overall residential growth.

    “We need it (the expansion), not just we want it,” said Milton Mayor Gord Krantz.

    The mayor said he understands the local community will have to pick up a percentage of the expansion costs, generally estimated at 30 per cent, and he said he expects some of that money will have to come from the property tax base.

    “It’s going to have to happen, there’s no doubt in my mind, whether it’s from the Regional or Town side (of property taxes),” Krantz said.

    For more information and to sign an online postcard in support of the expansion of Milton District Hospital, MiltonSearch.com invites you to visit the official Friends of Milton Hospital website.

    Comments on this story are moderated

    Mattamy Homes: Between Bricks and a hard place

    January 20th, 2009

    It looks like the times they-are-a-changin’ in Mattamy land:

    From YourHome.ca:

    Mattamy Homes CEO Peter Gilgan in his Oakville office.

    Mattamy Homes CEO Peter Gilgan in his Oakville office.

    As new home sales slip into a deep freeze, even Canada’s No.1 house builder is having to remodel

    Peter Gilgan shuffles a clump of paper on his large wooden desk. “These are all the bills,” he jokes to a photographer.

    As the largest house builder in Canada, Gilgan has taken proactive steps to avoid those looming bills as sales slow in the North American real estate market.

    His company, Mattamy Homes, laid off 50 staff in November.

    In a memo to employees, Gilgan called it “the most difficult and humbling” action he has had to take in his 30 years as a business leader.

    “The housing market is certainly not going to be as buoyant as it was. There are different expectations today than expectations from a year or two ago,” says the developer, sitting in his Oakville boardroom.

    On a crisp January day, Gilgan, 58, is suffering from a cold, but he is genial when greeting guests for a rare interview. Despite the fact he’s the CEO of the country’s largest builder of detached homes, with more than 40 sales and construction sites up and running throughout North America and more than a billion dollars in annual sales, the chartered accountant has always preferred to remain behind the scenes.

    But Mattamy’s fortunes are in many ways symbolic of what is happening in Canada’s softening real estate industry, especially because of its leadership position.

    According to the latest figures from the Building Industry and Land Development Association, total new-home sales in the GTA for the first 11 months of 2008 were down by 35 per cent. For low-rise homes, which Mattamy builds, industry-wide sales were off by 39.1 per cent. New-home companies have slashed prices and given away free trips and cars to entice buyers. Taking a page from the beleaguered car industry, Mattamy introduced “employee pricing” at select American sites last year, extending the same discounts to the public as to their employees.

    According to Gilgan’s figures, his company is doing much better than the average builder, closing 4,031 homes in 2007 with $1.5 billion in revenue and “just under” 4,000 homes in 2008 with $1.4 billion in revenue. The company has some 1,000 full-time employees.

    But all bets are off for this year.

    “The scope of the economic change is way beyond anything I anticipated,” Gilgan said in his memo.

    One could argue that because of the company’s size, as goes Mattamy, so goes the nation – or at least the fortunes of municipalities in the GTA. So far, a greater-than-expected drop in the real estate markets has taken a toll.

    Over the past couple of months, Mattamy has consolidated administrative staff from across the GTA into its Oakville headquarters, and has also closed its Markham office.

    “The decision reflects an anticipated further decline in volumes in our order book,” says Gilgan. “The net result is that we will cease to operate as three distinct divisions in the GTA and will manage as one organization from one location.”

    Gilgan says that to move homes during the downturn, the company has been “aggressively re-pricing our products and addressing design and quality processes.”

    Meanwhile, concerns are mounting about the financial impact the housing downturn will have on home builders across the board. Mattamy expanded aggressively in the United States. The company has multiple sites in four states including Florida, which has become ground zero for the subprime crisis.

    Gilgan insists Mattamy is actually in “better” shape than it has been in the past, despite the credit crunch that has crippled some developers.

    “We continue to owe less money so I’ll say things are better,” he says. “I lament that there aren’t more opportunities to invest.”

    He points out that ratings agency Standard & Poor’s recently left his company’s rating unchanged at BB.

    “There aren’t too many builders out there that can say the same thing,” he says. “We require very little outside financing and we have a willingness of lenders who continue to lend to us.”

    (According to Standard & Poor’s, a BB rating goes to a company with “marginal financial security characteristics. Positive attributes exist, but adverse financial conditions could lead to insufficient ability to meet financial commitments.”)

    In the U.S., meanwhile, sales are “starting to climb out of the basket,” says Gilgan. “Sales were down significantly.” They were, however, better in December, and January has been looking “positive,” he says.

    Sales in Canada have also dropped because of delays in getting some projects off the ground, Gilgan says. He blames a progressive tightening of requirements by municipal and regional governments that has made it difficult for developers to accurately predict when their land will be approved.

    “As developers we’re not expecting a handout, but we’re hoping that government can help us to expedite land development in a cost-effective way.”

    Gilgan warns that delays in some GTA projects caused by red tape could mean more layoffs at Mattamy this year.

    “Are we going to lay people off? Maybe. But it wouldn’t necessarily be because of the economy or the market,” he says. “If I can get my communities approved, then we’ll have growth. If not, then we’ll have shrinkage.”

    Growth, not retreat, has been the path of Mattamy for the last decade. Certainly last year, the company’s 30th anniversary, should have been one of celebration for Gilgan, who has been the industry’s poster boy for the last decade – for his success as well as his philanthropy.

    Mattamy has won every conceivable builder’s award, including a third J.D. Power award in 2008 for new home buyer satisfaction for the Greater Toronto Area. The year before that, Gilgan took home the prestigious Ernst & Young Canadian Entrepreneur of the Year title, taking his place among the Canadian business establishment.

    In Oakville, the former home that he shared with his now ex-wife and eight children was the grandest symbol of success. Edgemere sold last summer for an estimated $35.5 million, the largest price for a single family home in the province.

    But nothing is forever – at least in the development business. The new owners plan to tear down the 32,000-square-foot mansion that Gilgan built and replace it with 10 luxury condos.

    “I put a lot of work into it, so for me it was my attempt at art, since I can’t draw a stick man if you paid me. I put my artistic expression in my homes,” says Gilgan, who remembers flying to France just to buy door hardware and crystal for the home.

    “It was a lot of fun, and I got a lot of gratification out of it. But the new owners paid for it and they can certainly do what they want with it.”

    As the company heads into a downturn, Gilgan says he’s looking at ways to improve the business and relationships with partners to lay the seeds for when things turn around.

    “For over 13 years we have enjoyed the longest growth market cycle that anyone in the GTA can recall,” he says. “It has gone on for so long that many in our industry may not even realize this is a cyclical business.”

    Under Gilgan’s leadership, Mattamy has been a true innovator. The company is known for its “wide lot” brand, where the use of wider lots instead of the traditional long, narrow lots allows Mattamy to offer more interesting elevations and designs at more affordable prices.

    And taking a page from car assembly lines, the company also has a division that builds homes in an indoor plant, avoiding weather delays.

    “We have always tried to see everything from the customer’s viewpoint,” says Gilgan, explaining the company’s success.

    “And we’ll continue to do that, even when times are tough. We’ve seen this story before.”

    Comments on this story are moderated

    Message to McGuinty: Address the 905 Gap

    December 3rd, 2008

    We couldn’t have said this any better.

    An editorial from today’s Toronto Star:

    Simply put, the fastest growing parts of the province are receiving less funding, and a lower level of service, than elsewhere.

    Simply put, the fastest growing parts of the province are receiving less funding, and a lower level of service, than elsewhere.

    Surging population growth is widening an already serious gap in hospital funding in the regions surrounding Toronto. The same regions are being shortchanged in social services, too, and indications are that the gap will widen further in the coming years.

    That’s the upshot of a new report tallying provincial funding for hospital care and social services in the 905 regions (Durham, York, Peel and Halton) and other fast-growing regions such as Waterloo.

    Residents in these high-growth areas are receiving $254 per person less than other Ontarians for hospital care in the current fiscal year, according to the report by PricewaterhouseCoopers. That is up slightly from the $253 per person gap in the previous year. Six years ago, the gap was just $184.

    As for social services, residents of the GTA outside Toronto were each allocated $193 less than other Ontarians in 2006-07. That gap has narrowed from $218 per person in the previous year, but only because cuts to child-care funding resulted in less money for everyone.

    The province is aware of these disparities and is spending $120 million on hospitals in fast-growing communities, with the first $30 million going out this year. But a lot more is needed to close an annual gap of about $1.4 billion in hospital spending alone.

    Simply put, the fastest growing parts of the province are receiving less funding, and a lower level of service, than elsewhere. On the national stage, Premier Dalton McGuinty has repeatedly demanded more fairness for Ontario. That’s well and good, but he should also give some thought to providing more fairness inside Ontario.

    Comments on this story are moderated