Posts Tagged ‘Halton Region’

Deer hit on Thompson Rd.

May 28th, 2010
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

MiltonSearch.com would like to extend thanks to one of our readers for alerting us to this minor Milton news story — but an interesting one nonetheless.

Between 6 – 6:15am yesterday morning (May 27), one of our readers noticed a car stopped with its hazard lights on in the northbound left lane on Thompson Rd. at Nipissing just south of the overpass on the way to the Milton GO Station.

Upon driving by in the right lane, our reader noticed a deer of all things, lying on the road directly in front of the stopped car. We have to assume that the deer was in fact unfortunately hit by this motorist or another.

This of course happens all the time on rural roads and highways, but it is a little surprising to hear that deer would be trying to cross a wide, busy stretch of road in this developed area of town.

Or is it?

We’re all accustomed to rabbits, mice, voles, raccoons and the like creeping around our streets as they’re pushed out of their habitat by Milton’s aggressive development into Halton’s rural areas. There are also deer in these parts and apparently they’re living closer than we think.

The lesson in all of this: Milton’s expansion isn’t slowing down, but as drivers we can. Take a little extra care on Milton’s major routes early in the morning and late at night. Granted, deer are quick and unpredictable, making them almost unavoidable when driving — but be alert nonetheless.

Comments on this story are moderated

Milton Town Council Meetings should be streamed

January 20th, 2010
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

From Zeeshan Hamid:

spacer

Continue reading “Web-stream these meetings already!”

spacer

You can read Zeeshan Hamid’s blog here

spacer

Comments on this story are moderated

Did you get ‘the phone call?’

January 18th, 2010
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

At 5:00 am this past Saturday morning, the phones rang out at the offices of MiltonSearch.com, waking everyone from their slumber.

The reason for this 5am wake-up call? Well, it was an automated message from Halton District School Board letting us know that indeed, classes and field trips were cancelled for the day due to inclement weather.

It’s worth mentioning again that it was a Saturday morning and after running to the window to see what kind of winter storm we were experiencing, there was absolutely no snow to speak of.

Later in the day — after waking up on my own — whilst perusing the Hawthorne Villager discussion forums, I realized we weren’t the only lucky ones who received this early wake-up call.

School trustee Donna Danielli later posted the following apology in the thread:

I am so very sorry for the glitch in our system which sent 5 am phone calls out to all of our houses this morning.

Technology is great when it works, but when it doesn’t….grrrr!

Again, my apologies to all who disturbed so early on a weekend. Please know that the Board tech department is investigating and hopefully it won’t happen again.

Donna Danielli
Public School Trustee
daniellid@hdsb.ca

and this:

Again, I cannot apologize enough for those who were disturbed so early this morning. Our head of IT sent out the following explanations for those who are curious how it happened:

This message was sent in error. It occurred as a result of testing updates to the system. I.T staff did not double check the cancellation of a test message. This resulted in the system sending the message you received.

We take this situation very seriously. We apologize for waking households and for delivering an incorrect message. We apologize for undermining the value of the Home Notification System and will work to ensure this never happens again.

And then Sunday, I came across this article in the Toronto Star, realizing that this wasn’t limited to Milton — thousands of families across Halton received the call. Apparently ‘the call’ also made the airwaves on 680News later in the day.

Now, as bothersome as it was to be unexpectedly awakened early on a Saturday morning, it’s hard to imagine how this ended up as front page news in the Sunday Star. Slow news day or what?

Let’s keep this in perspective folks — it was just a phone call. These kinds of technical glitches happen — albeit not too often — but they happen. It’s not the end of the world.

To Donna Danielli: thank you for responding to the online posters and apologizing, although I’m pretty sure you didn’t have to and it definitely wasn’t your fault.

And what about us? Were we annoyed? Well, yes — but it’s good to know the school board’s new automated phone alert system is obviously operational, date issues aside.

Granted, our children stayed sound asleep and snuggled in their beds during all of this. If that wasn’t the case, well, I think this post would have had a slightly different tone.

Chill, people.

Comments on this story are moderated

Halton looking to protect 36% of its developable land

December 17th, 2009
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

Burlington farmer James Fisher says a natural heritage designation will inevitably put agricultural interests behind environmental concerns.

Burlington farmer James Fisher says a natural heritage designation will inevitably put agricultural interests behind environmental concerns.

Kudos to Halton Region, which is finally looking to limit development after a huge amount of some of Ontario’s finest farmland has already been or is planned to be developed on.

This will be interesting to watch as the situation pits green politicians vs. rural politicians supporting farmers vs. farmers who want to sell their land to developers vs. farmers who want to preserve Halton’s rich farmland.

You may also want to read two other articles posted previously on MiltonSearch.com: Strawberry Fields (not) Forever and A Farewell to Farms.

Below is an overview of Halton Region and its land designations. Click the image for an enlarged, interactive version.

Here is this latest column in it’s entirety from the Toronto Star:

Where Homes Don’t Grow

Halton’s radical plan to limit development pits red-taped farmers against green politicians

Outspoken Oakville councillor Allan Elgar has a name for the practice of building a sprawling subdivision on prime farmland: He calls it “the final crop.”

That’s why the farmboy-turned-environmentalist is backing Halton Region’s groundbreaking proposal to set its own protections on an extensive natural heritage system. The plan would preserve a whopping 36 per cent of the region’s developable land, set up an integrated network of preserved areas, and drastically curtail where houses can be planted some day.

The land included is neither part of the protected greenbelt and Niagara Escarpment nor under consideration for development.

But the move is pitting green-minded politicians in Oakville and Burlington against those in Halton Hills and Milton, who are more responsive to concerns raised by farmers and development interests and have opposed it. A final vote is slated for Dec. 16.

Supporters make no bones about the fact the plan will thwart speculators who have bought, or arranged to buy, vast hectares of prime agricultural land in Halton, and the farmers who want to sell it.

Caught in the crossfire, however, are farmers who don’t want to sell but are deeply concerned that the new designation will add another layer of regulation that bodes ill for farming in the long run.

It is, contends James Fisher, all about how words are interpreted.

“The actual designation has negative impact,” said Fisher, one of several farmers who spoke to Halton regional council this week. “It’s not that we are against the natural heritage system. We want an alternative that respects agriculture.”

They fear that replacing the current agricultural zoning with the term “natural heritage” will inevitably put farming interests behind environmental concerns, despite repeated assurances that farming will always be allowed.

Farmers want, at a minimum, to see the natural heritage system designated as preserving both environmental features and agriculture.

Whatever the final wording, Elgar and most of the Halton councillors seem ready to approve the creation of a vast “systems-based” network of natural heritage corridors to connect environmentally sensitive areas such as river valleys, woodlots and wetlands.

It would end the old practice of protecting only isolated pockets, which tend to degrade over time if there are no corridors ensuring that wildlife can move freely.

The proposal may be more radical than the provincial greenbelt legislation because it bans golf courses anywhere on the system, whereas the province just blocks golf courses from prime agricultural land.

“If we get this, we will be the first region in the Greater Toronto Area with a systems-based approach on a regional basis,” said Elgar, describing the preservation plan as simply an extra layer of protection.

“It is a no-touch zone … There is concern that there is a lot of farming land bought by the development industry, with the hope in future of flipping it to plant houses.”

The plan would not only make protected areas off-limits but also make anything built within 120 metres of a natural heritage feature or corridor subject to an environmental impact assessment – a proposition feared both by developers and farmers who want to make improvements to their property.

While other GTA municipalities are also doing more long-range development planning now, Halton’s scheme is the most ambitious.

In the face of similar opposition, Peel Region politicians recently deferred a decision on their own plan, which targets mostly farmland in Brampton and Caledon. Peel’s plan is less stringent than Halton’s – it has been slammed by the Sierra Club for example, for allowing golf courses to be built in the valley lands of its waterways.

Halton politicians could take courage from an Ontario Municipal Board ruling last year that approved Oakville’s controversial decision to protect 900 hectares on its own initiative. The preservation area – won after a decade-long tussle with the development industry – represents more than one-third of the 3,400 hectares of undeveloped land north of Dundas St. W.

The OMB ruling was a major victory for the likes of Elgar, Oakville Mayor Rob Burton and members of the environmental group Oakvillegreen, who had fought to preserve green space in north Oakville while making room for an eventual population of more than 50,000.

The ruling also emboldened them and other Halton Region politicians to go after developers for thousands of dollars in extra development charges on each home sold – significantly higher than other regions – under the mantra that “growth must pay for itself” and municipal government doesn’t exist to subsidize developer profits.

Halton Hills Councillor Clark Sommerville says the intention behind the natural heritage system proposal is good – and driven by urban councillors from Oakville and Burlington who are trying to make amends for the fact their communities were largely built out before such protections existed.

But he thinks it’s “overkill.”

No matter how well-intentioned, overregulation “will be the death knell of farming,” Somerville said – not development.

“The biggest thing we are trying to protect is the non-urban rural land from development, but the way it’s being written it almost appears that agriculture is the threat,” he said.

Still, environmentalists such as Liz Benneian of Oakvillegreen say the new rules will ensure protection for farmers. Her only concern is that a provision in the original plan – superimposing the natural heritage system on Greenbelt areas as a second layer of protection against a future change of heart by the province – has since been removed.

“We believe this is a forward-thinking plan from planners and politicians,” Benneian said. “A gift to our grandchildren.”

Comments on this story are moderated

A farewell to farms

November 16th, 2007

From the Toronto Star:

Bert Andrews of Andrews' Scenic Acres in Milton believes Ontario agriculture is in big trouble

After 27 seasons, Andrews' Scenic Acre, on the outskirts of Milton, is going the way most farms in the area have gone -- out of business.

When even a relatively successful operator has had it, you know Ontario agriculture is in big trouble

There’s something new growing in Bert Andrews’ field, in front of the patch of long-wilted rhubarb and the wispy, overgrown asparagus.

“For Sale/Lease, By Owner” reads the giant white sign, “Growing Farm Business, Winery and Farm Property. ”

After 27 seasons, Andrews’ Scenic Acre, on the outskirts of Milton, is going the way most farms in the area have gone — out of business.

Not because it hasn’t been profitable — this past season has been Andrews’ best to date. But he had open-heart surgery last year, and none of his children wants to take over the operation.

“I’m 64 years old — I want my Sundays off,” Andrews says on a warm fall afternoon, looking out at his fields and the russet-coloured Niagara Escarpment in the distance. The heads of his towering Russian sunflowers have long turned black and now curl downward. The last of his pumpkins have been sold. And the haystack, which visiting schoolchildren jumped on until last week, will soon be dismantled — perhaps for the last time.

It’s the end of an era, not just for Andrews, but also for agriculture in the Toronto area.This is the best farmland in the country. But we’re quickly paving it over. The Greater Toronto Area — including Durham, Halton, Peel and York regions — lost 16 per cent of its farms between 1996 and 2001. Since then, another five per cent have disappeared.

There’s a sign nailed beside the door of Andrews’ barn that reads: “Farmers Feed Cities.” It should say: “Cities Eat Farms.”

Up to 80 per cent of the produce we buy travels thousands of kilometres by truck or plane. Even apples — which are quintessentially Ontarian and can keep in cold storage for months — travel 5,900 kilometres on average to get to us, according to a recent Region of Waterloo Health study.

Contrary to what one might think given how much of our food is imported, Canadians spend less of their disposable income on nourishment — about 10 per cent on food and non-alcoholic beverages, according to the OECD — than residents of most other developed countries. A related fact: domestic farmers make less than half of what Toronto garbage collectors earn. (The average farm earns less than $25,000 a year before expenses, according to the latest census report.)

The profession’s self-esteem is in the gutter. As Andrews regularly points out, Ontario agriculture minister was once a plum posting. Now, it’s an afterthought, rarely noted in reports about cabinet shuffles, because it’s no longer considered a powerful portfolio, even though it’s the only ministry that touches all of us many times daily.

Faced with a future of long hours, little respect and less pay, is it surprising that young farmers are leaving the land in droves?

Despite the growing local food movement, most farmers and food policy wonks agree: the future of Ontario farming is bleak. Most predict it will take a horrific event like 9/11 to wake us up to the dangers of relying entirely on foreign food.

“I have a three-month-old granddaughter, and I don’t want her to be hungry in her lifetime,” says Mike Shook, program manager with FarmStart, a Guelph-area non-profit aiming to get more farmers on the land. “If we keep in the direction we are, I fear she will be.”

Many urge the government to take action before it’s too late. The Greenbelt — which protects 720,000 hectares of land circling Toronto from development — is a start, they say. But protecting land is one thing; ensuring that food grows on it is another. Horse farms are the second fastest-growing agricultural category in the Toronto area, after cash crops like winter wheat, according to the last census.

“We need a master plan,” says Andrews.

He remains among the small minority of optimists. How else would he have survived almost three decades of farming near Milton, the fastest growing municipality in the country, as subdivisions and golf ranges replaced the fields he once ploughed?

The ultimate proof: he hopes to sell his property to a farmer.

“There are people who think I don’t have a hope in hell,” he chuckles. “But I’ve been hearing that all my life.”

To an outsider, Andrews’ Scenic Acres seems one of the most successful farms around. The 39-hectare property bursts with blackberries, pumpkins, strawberries … as well as 17,000 bottles of fruit wine a year. Andrews runs a bustling market out of one of his barns and sends his produce out to eight farmers’ markets every week.

More than 15,000 school children tour his farm each summer. And far more than that come out, mostly on weekends, to pet his goats and ride a tractor out to the fields to pick their own food. One Sunday this fall, a record 3,300 people swarmed the farm to pick pumpkins. For many city slickers, such “entertainment farms” have become their only connection to rural life.

No matter how successful and cherished Andrews’ Scenic Acres may be, is it realistic to think a farmer will buy it when speculators are scooping up property all around Andrews? Nearby farmland inside the Greenbelt is going for $20,000 an acre — a price most farmers could never afford. Farms like his that fall outside the Greenbelt border are running at $50,000 an acre. Which means only a Rosedale stockbroker would have the necessary cash.

That’s exactly who Andrews is banking on — “It would have to be somebody who had passion.”

Wayne Roberts, project co-ordinator for the Toronto Food Policy Council, has a different buyer in mind: the Ontario government. “That’s obvious to anyone concerned with the future of food security in Ontario,” he says. Not only would the province save the most productive land from being stripped of its topsoil and converted to homes and malls, but it could also boost aspiring farmers into the business by renting out small acreages to them at affordable prices — he calls them “farm condominiums.”

“Once land is changed from agriculture into something else,” he says, “it’s almost impossible to reclaim. If this farm goes, it’s not late — it’s too late.”

Comments on this story are moderated

Strawberry fields (not) forever

August 21st, 2007

From the Toronto Star:

Mexican labourers plant strawberries behind the tractor of Bert Andrews, whose farm is now the only one left growing them around Milton.

Mexican labourers plant strawberries behind the tractor of Bert Andrews, whose farm is now the only one left growing them around Milton.

Perilous exchange sees rich farmland around the GTA sprouting subdivisions

Bert Andrews sits atop his tractor in the middle of a chocolate milkshake field.

The earth below his giant wheels is grey-brown and frothy — so soft it crumbles like foam, so moist it doesn’t raise dust. It’s also teeming with nutrients.

Just perfect for strawberries.

“This is the nicest soil you can find,” Andrews says, looking over his shoulder at the row of Mexican labourers he’s towing behind him on a finger planter.

The planter looks like a rickety CNE ride. It has four metal seats separated by miniature wheels with funnel spokes. Each labourer sits behind a stack of young, tender strawberry plants, and when a spoke comes up, he slots a plant in. The wheel spins it down and – click – plants it in the ground with a little squirt of water.

Four other workers with shovels follow behind slowly, doing quality control — tucking in exposed roots; packing down earth.

“You missed one there,” Andrews says, pointing to a plant the size of one of his fingers on the ground. He’s spent $9,000 this year on strawberry plants alone. He wants to make sure they survive.

While the pumpkins he’ll plant next year draw bigger crowds, strawberries are his biggest seller.

Ontario strawberries burst onto the scene in late June. Four weeks of mouth-bursting sweetness reminds us briefly that strawberries — like everything grown from the earth — have a season, and that some things are worth waiting for.

When Andrews bought his farm just north of Milton almost 30 years ago, there were six other strawberry growers in the area. He’s the only one left.

Once a bustling farming hub, the area has become a distant suburb of Toronto. The farm equipment dealerships have all left. Brick mansions have replaced barns. And fields that once sprouted wheat and sweet corn are now golf fairways.

It’s a perilous exchange. The farmland around Toronto is among the best in the country. It’s ranked almost exclusively class one and two — making it ideal for everything from strawberries to sweet corn. But increasingly, we’re planting subdivisions on it.

The Greater Toronto area lost 16 per cent of its farms between 1996 and 2001. Since then, another 5 per cent have vanished.

Once lost, the farmland can’t be replaced. The ground elsewhere just isn’t as fertile, and the climate not as generous. One farmer who moved fewer than 20 kilometres from Burlington to Waterdown lost the moderating effect of the lake, and with it, two whole weeks of the growing season.

“We need to be aware what w’re giving up,” says Margaret Walton, a Muskoka planner specializing in Ontario agriculture. “We can build houses anywhere. Why do we all have to live on prime farmland?”

What makes the land around Toronto so good? When the glaciers receded 10,000 years ago, they left minerals essential for plants — magnesium, potassium, calcium, zinc. The resulting soil is a fine mix of sand, silt and clay, making it easy to manage. It clumps well, allowing roots to take hold, but not suffocating them after a rainfall. And it’s deep and relatively stone-free. “That’s the ideal,” says Ray McBride, a soil-science professor at the University of Guelph. “That’s why Toronto is where it is. Pioneers looked at the area and saw it had sandy, good soil, lots of water, and not a lot of snowfall.”

Even more important than the soil is the climate. We have more frost-free days here than almost anywhere else in the province.

Despite those advantages, we truck in as much as 80 per cent of our fruit and vegetables.

We could soon be trucking it all in.

Even in the heart of our strawberry season, Loblaws sells California imports cheaper than Andrews can at his own farm.

It’s an economy of scale. California boasts seven times Ontario’s strawberry fields — 14,000 hectares compared to 2,000. The state grows them all year round, which is why you can still find them in January.

The only advantage Ontario growers have is your mouth. “They’re picking (California strawberries) when they’re not ripe, so they’re not going to be as sweet,” says Andrews.

It’s sunny and warm — perfect for planting. Big fat clouds dot the sky. A train moans in the distance, and Porfirio Contreras Vazquez, one of his workers, is singing a love song. “Tengo mied.”

These plants won’t bear fruit until next summer, when they’ve matured and begun to fill in — sending out sprout-like runners, which root down into the earth, forming “daughter” plants. Those then will put out delicate white flowers next May, which, if pollinated by one of the bees Andrews rents from a local beekeeper, will form into berries.

Given enough water, no pests and winter protection, this tiny plant will grow more than 100 berries over the next three — maybe four — years, before Andrews ploughs it under to make way for winter wheat or sweet corn.

“They just get old and not productive — like a lot of things,” chuckles Andrews, 63.

Having finished planting the last row, the Mexicans head back to the farm for lunch. Andrews follows slowly behind them on his tractor.

Halfway up the field, something catches his eye. He leaps down, bounding like a fawn along the straw that separates the row of calf-high strawberry plants that he put down two summers ago.

There, at the top, in a cluster of neon-green berries, are two blood-red ones. “That’s what it’s all about,” Andrews says triumphantly. “All this effort, all this work, now we’re seeing, as they say, the fruit.”

The Last Straw: Did you know?

  • Strawberry farmers traditionally put straw between rows. Hence the name, although some historians peg it to how strawberries “strew” or spread through tendrils.
  • The straw is used for many things. In winter, , it is put on top of the plants to protect them. In summer, it becomes mulch, keeping down weeds, and also makes for softer picking on your knees.
  • As with apples, there are many varieties of strawberries. They vary in shape, size, colour and time of ripening. A farmer can extend the season by two weeks by growing Annapolis berries, which ripen first in June, midseason Miras, and late-blooming Cabots, which bear fruit at the end of June.
  • “Day-neutral” berries are becoming more common in Ontario. From California, they don’t depend on a certain amount of daylight to bloom, putting out berries through the summer and into the fall. Unlike local varieties, they are usually grown in raised beds, covered by plastic. Both techniques aim to keep the soil warm during the fall and spring.

Comments on this story are moderated