Cialis online Clomid online Viagra online

Archive for the ‘Transit’ category

How to get the 905 to love road tolls

March 25th, 2010
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

Milton commuters: would you be more inclined to pay road tolls if the funds went toward improvements to GO Transit rather than the TTC?

Milton commuters: would you be more inclined to pay road tolls if the funds went toward improvements to GO Transit rather than the TTC?

Jim Tovey’s article today in the Toronto Star’s Your City My City section had an interesting take on the concept of toll roads in Toronto.

I’ve always had a hunch that highways such as the Gardiner Expressway and 401 would ultimately end up as toll roads — at least for those in Toronto’s suburbs, better known as “the 905.” With so much traffic on Toronto’s highways coming from commuters not contributing taxes towards Canada’s largest city, it makes sense for the City of Toronto to want to try to claim a proverbial ‘pound of flesh’ from those who reside outside the fair city but are more than happy to make a living there.

We all know how supposedly underfunded the TTC is, and it’s always been assumed the funds from such tolls would go straight to the City of Toronto’s own transit system. I’m sure they do need the funding, but what do you think the odds are of the TTC expanding into the 905 anytime soon?

The answer: don’t hold your breath.

Mr. Tovey makes the case that it would be much easier for Toronto’s suburbanite commuters to accept road tolls if the proceeds went to Metrolinx, in an effort to make improvements (and maybe reduce costs, right Mr. Salmons?) to GO Transit — the other option for traveling into the city for 905 commuters.

What do you think? If the 401 and Gardiner were toll roads, would you continue driving into Toronto on those roads, would you start taking GO Transit if you aren’t already (assuming that’s a viable option) and does it matter into which coffers the toll road profits end up?

Here is Mr. Tovey’s post:

Would those of us in the 905 ante up $5 for the privilege of sitting on the Gardiner Expressway two hours a day? Particularly if the five bucks was going to expand the Toronto subway system? The short answer, if the poll was strictly 905, is absolutely not!

If the question was slightly different the answer may be the reverse.

I avoid driving into Toronto. The last time I was forced into daily trips for work was five winters ago while restoring a house in Rosedale. Toronto is not particularly truck friendly, parking is restricted and the Green Hornets seem to stake out residential construction sites.

The trip, from home in south east Mississauga was 1 to 1 ½ hours each way, gas was about $120 a week, parking tickets $25 to $50 weekly. Any fiscally responsible contractor has to build this cost into the contract, so in this situation the extra $10 daily would be born by a Toronto resident.

Therefore, if the funding from tolls goes to the Toronto Transit Commission, that’s fine. Personally, I chose to work closer to home. Most people who make this daily pilgrimage do not have the luxury of a choice.

As chair of the Legacy Foundation, I often go to Toronto for meetings and I always take the GO train.

Herein lies the problem for a 905er with the funding going to subway expansions.

The Long Branch GO station is a mile and a half from my house at Cawthra and Lakeshore. The GO parking lot is continually full and street parking is impossible, which leaves Mississauga Transit the only option.

Here is how the trip plays out. I dutifully wait for Mississauga Transit, until I get bored, which takes five minutes, and then I walk east towards Long Branch. The Mississauga Transit bus usually passes me when I am within 200 metres of the GO station. Clearly an improved subway system in Toronto is not going to alleviate the challenge of getting people in the 905 out of cars and into transit. Toll fees directed to that end will not engender buy-in from anyone outside of Toronto.

From a 905 perspective, if the funding were going to Metrolinx to harmonize public transportation on a regional basis, I believe there would be wide support for tolls.

Transit in the GTA has traditionally taken a fortress mentality, there have been pitched battles in the past over the use of bus stops, and municipal schedules rarely connect. The problem is not so much public transit in Toronto; the problem for us is getting to it. Metrolinx was established to solve this dilemma and they have an expansive plan, “The Big Move”, to resolve this disparity.

Use the toll money for regionally improved, frequent service and I might occasionally take the car downtown just so I can contribute my $5.

Comments on this story are moderated

Petition Against 5% Increase in GO Transit Fares for 2010

February 14th, 2010
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

GO Transit has announced that yet again during a recession, they plan to raise fares by 5% in 2010.

GO Transit has announced that yet again during a recession, they plan to raise fares by 5% in 2010.

As he was a year ago, Milton resident Andrew Salmons is all over GO Transit’s recent announcement that they will yet again raise fares by 5% for 2010.

I’d have to agree with Mr. Salmons on this one. During not only a recession, but a supposed environmental crisis — not to mention the traffic issues faced daily by GTA commuters — this is absolutely the wrong decision by GO.

I realize GO is continuing to make improvements and additions to their service, but it’s wrong to hit riders with this increase, especially with so many experiencing either wage freezes or taking pay cuts in the past year thanks to the state of the world economy.

In my mind, it would make sense for GO to keep costs down as much as possible so that taking transit becomes a ‘no-brainer’ for commuters. There would probably be an increase in ridership which would fund planned improvements and growth. And if funding falls a little short, well, the government seems to be more than willing to throw around stimulus money these days… Wouldn’t appeasing the huge number of GO commuters be seen as ‘low hanging fruit’ by the Provincial Government?

Are you a user of GO Transit? If so, we would encourage you to do your part by signing the online petition we received from Andrew Salmons via email.

Will this change anything? More than likely not, but I think it’s important for GO to see where it’s riders stand on this announcement and also read your comments and suggestions.

From Andrew Salmons:

GO Transit has done it again! They are increasing your monthly pass rate by 5% again this year, on top of the 5% increase last year. That is a 10% increase in just 2 years, while annual inflation is 1.2% as of December 2009, and was 1.3% as of March 2009.

To put the latest 5% increase in perspective:

A rider traveling from Milton to Union will now pay $272 per month from $260 in 2009, $250 in 2008, and $246 in 2007. 8.8% increase since March 2008.

A rider traveling from Oakville to Union will now pay $214.50 per month from $205 in 2009, and $195 in 2008. 10% increase since March 2008.

Add your name to petition the Legislative Assembly of Ontario to (1) reduce GO Transit fares to be inline with inflation since 2007, (2) conduct a complete review GO Transit’s operating expenses and contracts, and (3) develop and implement a strategy for economically sustainable and affordable transit in Ontario.

I ask you for your support and ask you add your name this year’s petition against the fare increase.

Please sign here

Feel free to forward this petition to your friends, co-workers, and family, and your Member of Provincial Parliament.

Thank you for your support!

Comments on this story are moderated

Boyne Survey: “They have to have someplace to live”

February 21st, 2009

The Boyne Survey will be the site of the third phase of Milton’s residential growth, the previous two having started over the past 10 years. Once all three phases are complete, Halton’s regional staff estimate Milton’s population will be close to 150,000 by 2021.

The Boyne Survey will be the site of the third phase of Milton’s residential growth, the previous two having started over the past 10 years. Once all three phases are complete, Halton’s regional staff estimate Milton’s population will be close to 150,000 by 2021.

An intersting story in this weekend’s Champion on Milton’s development from the ‘other’ side. Farmer Hugh Beaty describes the development approaching his Omagh farm as “they have to have someplace to live.”

Yes, it’s hard to believe the next phase of Milton’s development will be creeping into the territory of the small hamlet of Omagh, but Mr. Beaty, it’s not that simple…

Yes, we all knew Milton was primed for a serious population boom as Mississauga and Oakville neared their capacity, but the flipside is that this development comes at the expense of some of Southern Ontario’s and certainly Halton Region’s best farmland.

It makes you wonder about where or when the Town of Milton should draw the line on their expansion plans. We’ll see as time goes on as to whether the tough economic state we’re in affects those decisions as well.

Enjoy, and as always, we invite you to leave your comments below.

From The Milton Canadian Champion:

For 90 years, Hugh Beaty has watched the once small town of Milton inch closer to his farm near Omagh, in the area formerly known as Trafalgar North.

Yet, though he was taken away from his home at times — serving in the Second World War, doing charitable work in northeastern Brazil — he was always able to return to a farming community.

“I’m still living on the farm I was born on,” noted Beaty, whose family name is the namesake of a community and under-construction library branch in the town.

Soon, though, the retired farmer’s 100-acre property on Fourth Line, just south of Britannia Road, will no longer look out onto flat farmland. Instead, it will be face to face with the growing urban area of Milton.

“They’re going to come,” said Beaty of the population increases in Milton. “They have to have someplace to live.”

Where they — up to 50,000 new residents — will live was the subject of a public meeting last week on what is called the Boyne Survey- Education Village secondary plan.

The 950-hectare Boyne lands are bounded by Louis Saint Laurent Boulevard to the north, James Snow Parkway to the east, Britannia Road to the south and Tremaine Road to the west. The Town is also including the 165-hectare area known as the Education Village at the northwest corner of Britannia and Tremaine roads in the secondary plan.

Beaty, along with more than 50 other local residents, attended the session to find out what planning has already been undertaken by the Town in preparation for opening up the area to residential development, perhaps by 2013.

According to the Town’s planning consultant, Liz Howson, much of the background research on the Boyne area has been completed, including sub-watershed studies and retail requirements to service the proposed community.

The Boyne Survey will be the site of the third phase of Milton’s residential growth, the previous two having started over the past 10 years. Once all three phases are complete, Halton’s regional staff estimate Milton’s population will be close to 150,000 by 2021.

What might distinguish the Boyne area compared to the first two growth phases, according to Howson, is a focus on transit-supportive development. This would include higher density development at the intersections of major streets and a possible transit hub located at the Education Village, which is the proposed site for a campus of Wilfrid Laurier University.

Planning has already begun for widening important traffic corridors as well. The Region foresees the widening of Tremaine from Britannia to north of the 401 starting in 2013, with a portion between Derry Road and Main Street in 2011. And the Region will start an environmental assessment for the widening of Britannia between Tremaine and Trafalgar Road this year, said Town planner Bill Mann. Construction on Britannia is also scheduled to begin in 2013.

The next stage in the planning process is the creation of land use options in the Boyne survey area. The options will be the subject of another public workshop Thursday, Mar. 5, before being whittled down to a preferred option to go to Milton council for approval.

Comments on this story are moderated

GO Transit gets $500M boost

February 21st, 2009

The question now is to see what this means for Milton, where extensive improvements have already been made to the GO Station over the past few years. Expanded train service on weekends? We encourage GO Transit riders to leave suggestions in our comments section below.

From The Toronto Star

Milton GO Transit Station

Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty says such investments "give us a more competitive economy in the longer term."

In a bid to get the ailing economy back on the rails, Ottawa and Queen’s Park are boosting investment in GO Transit.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Premier Dalton McGuinty today announced that up to $500 million will be spent to improve a dozen GO station parking lots and upgrading rail lines to increase service reliabiliity.

The funding will be divided equally between the provincial and federal governments.

Harper and McGuinty made a theatrical arrival at the GO yards in Mimico aboard a locomotive to disclose the news.

“This investment will create jobs for local construction workers in communities throughout Southern Ontario,” said Harper.

McGuinty said such investments “give us a more competitive economy in the longer term.”

“When transit is more convenient, more people leave their car at home. That means a better quality of life for our families and a cleaner, stronger and more beautiful province,” the premier said.

Today’s funding is a part of the previously announced $3.09 billion Ontario will receive from Ottawa’s Building Canada program.

Comments on this story are moderated

Eales fed-up, gives up bid to repair GO

January 16th, 2009

From the Toronto Star:

Pat Eales, who rallied 11,000 angry GO riders to sign a petition last winter, quit her job and has given up on commuting.

Pat Eales, who rallied 11,000 angry GO riders to sign a petition last winter, quit her job and has given up on commuting.

The woman who rallied 11,000 angry GO commuters to sign a petition last winter has quit the customer service advisory committee inspired by her efforts.

Saying she couldn’t handle another winter of long, frustrating commutes on the GO train, Pat Eales found a new job about 15 minutes from her Oakville home – ironically overlooking the GO station.

On days like Wednesday, when thousands of commuters were left in the deep freeze because of train delays, Eales says she thanks her lucky stars she no longer suffers the commute to downtown Toronto.

She started an online GO petition after being late for work repeatedly last winter. It demanded a freeze on fare hikes and a 50 per cent refund on fares when trains are delayed 20 minutes or more.

The petition tapped enormous customer outrage – 11,000 disgruntled commuters signed on – but wasn’t enough to persuade GO to cancel a 15-cent-a-ride fare hike. GO also argued that since it relies heavily on fares, a late-train refund would have come out of commuters’ pockets anyway.

GO did, however, set up a committee of seven train riders and one bus passenger to advise the board and staff on how to improve service.

Eales quit after the first committee meeting, in September, when she found her new job – something she says probably would have happened anyway.

At that meeting, Eales said members were given a free lunch, a return fare to GO’s downtown office and a model double-decker bus. But most members of the committee – composed of riders from each of GO’s lines and a student – remain anonymous.

“After all I did and the things I wanted to accomplish, I didn’t feel that was the venue for it,” she said.

“How are we supposed to be a liaison between (GO Transit) and the GO transit riders if no one knows who we are and no one knows we even exist?” asked Eales, who said she was required to sign a confidentiality agreement when she joined the committee.

“GO assembled these representatives to be a confidential sounding board for their policies and plans,” said GO spokesperson Vanessa Thomas. “It’s not so much that they are anonymous, but their role is specific and related to providing advice to GO.”

Committee members were solicited on the GO website and, so far, have focused on learning about the GO system. They did support the move to put defibrillators on trains.

Comments on this story are moderated

Have you taken Milton Transit?

October 9th, 2008

Mike Cluett
Mike Cluett’s Milton Blog

Did the Town of Milton suffer from the “chicken and the egg” syndrome?  Did they spend millions of dollars unnecessarily to get brand new buses that could fit more people BEFORE the people actually take the bus?

Mike Cluett says that while we will need a transit system in town, it has to be economically viable.

Mike Cluett says that while we will need a transit system in town, it has to be economically viable.

As I’ve stated in the past, I do beleive Milton needs a transit system for its increasing population.  There has to be a way for someone to get downtown Milton from lets say Hawthorne Village for the Farmers Market on Saturday instead of getting in the car, trying in vain to get up Thompson Road, turn left at Main and head on down.  We all know the downtown area isnt meant for lots of vehicle traffic and the bus would be the preferred way.

Only problem is that no one is taking advantage of it.  Recent Milton Transit reports show that the only time ridership on the buses increases is when there are FREE TRANSIT days, sponsored usually by corporate citizens like Mattamy Homes, Fieldgate etc. and go back down to almost non existant levels when Miltonians have to pay.  While we will need a transit system in town, it has to be economically viable.  We cant just keep throwing money at the issue and hope someone will take the bus.  We cant have a program if no one is using it.  The town can throw money around and try to educate people that taking the bus is the better way.

Continue reading on Mike Cluett’s Milton Blog

Heat wave slows Milton GO Trains

July 19th, 2008

go train milton to toronto

Those familiar with taking the GO Train into Toronto from Milton are well aware of all of the trials and tribulations involved. Those of you thinking about or who have recently moved to Milton and plan to commute into the city via the GO Trains might be interested in this recent article on why you can just throw that handy, dandy train schedule out the window when the temperatures heat up…

From Tess Kalinowski, Transportation Reporter at the Toronto Star:

GO Transit is warning of 15- to 30-minute delays on the Milton line in light of today’s extremely hot weather.

But based on last summer’s experience, which saw delays usually in the two- to three-minute range, those delays could be much shorter, said GO spokesperson Jessica Kosmack this afternoon.

The Milton line is owned by Canadian Pacific, which slows its trains to 64 kilometres per hour (40 miles per hour) once the temperature hits 32 degrees C, she said.

That allows the engineer and conductor in the locomotive to see if a kink has developed in the rail ahead due to heat expansion, explained CP spokesperson Mike Lovecchio.

CN also slows its passenger and freight trains once the temperature hits 30 degrees C but the delays in the Toronto-area tend to be insignificant, said company spokesperson Mark Hallman.

In many cases, because of the number of stops on the GO lines, the trains wouldn’t normally exceed the hot weather speed limit of 105 kilometres per hour. ( 65 miles per hour)

GTA Commuting: A ticket to ride on the 401?

June 8th, 2008

Passengers wait to ride the Gold Line, a rapid transit line between Los Angeles and Pasadena, Calif., from an at-grade station in the middle of an expressway.

One lobby group says there’s a simple, cost-effective way of building a commuter rail line through our busiest highway. There’s no shortage of critics who say it’s a pipe dream

Imagine you’re among the nearly 450,000 drivers idling on Highway 401 through the Toronto area on a typical weekday, bumper-to-bumper traffic burning a $1.27-a-litre hole in your pocket and the ozone.

Now, fast forward just over a decade, when gridlock and gas prices are expected to make 2008 look like the good old days, and you glance from your car to see a high-speed, electric train stop in the middle of the 401. Hundreds of waiting passengers file aboard, open their papers and laptops and speed off.

Before you’ve passed the next exit, they’re halfway to work.

No one disputes that something must be done to ease the traffic congestion choking Highway 401 across the top of Toronto.

It’s bad for the environment and the economy, to say nothing of the physical and mental toll on drivers.

But now a group of sustainability advocates is pushing a radical solution to get the 401 moving again.

The idea – eliminating one lane of traffic in each direction to put subway-style rail down the middle of the highway – may be counter-intuitive.

It’s certainly ambitious – 51 kilometres and 28 new stations from Pickering through Pearson International Airport to Mississauga. It’s time-consuming – 12 years to complete. And, it’s costly – $5.9 billion.

But, the Sustainable Urban Development Association, or SUDA, believes we can no longer afford to ignore the need for a car alternative to east-west travel across the GTA.

“The need for sustainable transportation is expanding dramatically,” said John Stillich, general manager of SUDA, a charitable organization devoted to environmentally sensitive city building. “Climate shifts are happening faster than people previously thought, energy prices are hitting the fan.

“It’s gotta happen.”

There’s no shortage of critics lining up to say it cannot happen. They argue it’s too costly, the 401 is already too congested to reduce lanes and that getting people in and out of stations in the middle of a highway will prove difficult to impossible.

And, despite ever-worsening gridlock, critics are not even convinced there’s enough demand for public transit there.

Stillich, a former senior financial analyst with the province, first floated the idea of a 401RT more than a decade ago. While applauding the $11.5 billion Queen’s Park pledged last year for public transit projects across the GTA and Hamilton by 2020, he said they won’t keep up with growth in road travel.

An essential component of cutting congestion and pollution across the GTA is an east-west transit line across its middle – Highway 401.

The SUDA concept would see trains stop at stations typically located on bridges and underpasses, which are wide enough for buses to drop off passengers without the need for expensive bus terminals. From one end in Pickering to the other in Mississauga would take about 75 minutes, with travel to Yonge St. from 35 to 40 minutes either way.

“If we don’t do it now, we’re going to have greater hardship for everybody in the GTA,” Stillich said, forecasting 150 million riders a year on a line that would cost $304 million to operate. “Things will get worse.”

Stillich is hoping Metrolinx, the body developing a comprehensive transportation plan for the region, will include the 401RT as part of its draft due out this summer.

Though there’s an obvious sticker shock that comes with a $5.9 billion tab, when broken down over its 12-year construction period and with the expected federal and provincial support that comes with major infrastructure projects, the average annual cost per income taxpayer in Toronto, Peel and Durham comes in at $60, Stillich said. With the price for gas and other driving expenses climbing, he’s sure people will see trading in their wheels for rails as a bargain.

“It’s only high cost in terms of the dollar amounts that people have to spend to put the thing together,” he said. “But if you look at the resultant impact on households of that initial investment, it’s cheaper than business as usual by a long shot.”

To back up its argument, SUDA used part of a $76,000 Ontario Trillium Foundation grant to survey households across the GTA. It found more than two-thirds of respondents willing to pay more to improve public transit.

That’s in line with an Ipsos Reid survey of 1,000 residents of the GTA and Hamilton done last fall for Metrolinx. It found two-thirds believe increasing public transit is the best way to improve the traffic situation, compared with one-third calling for more roads.

Metrolinx also has its eye on public transit across the 401. But it envisions an express bus corridor using high-occupancy vehicle lanes.

Stillich, who is looking for a “political champion” to push the 401RT concept, admits SUDA’s pitch needs more thorough analysis through a feasibility study.

But a huge hurdle with a 401RT is access, said Toronto transit activist Steve Munro. With trains running down the middle of the highway it would be next to impossible to get passengers into stations without large – and expensive – bus interchanges, parking lots or tunnels.

Also, the sprawl-oriented development across the 905 region “is not suited to transit,” unlike the concentrated areas of Toronto serviced by the subway. Add to that the fact that few people have a final destination on the 401 and a rail line proves “superficially seductive” but impractical, Munro said.

“The idea that somehow we are going to solve regional transportation problems by putting an express line on the 401 sounds nice in theory, but how the hell do you get people to it?” said Munro.

SUDA’s concept includes a massive network of buses, much like those that will feed Toronto’s seven planned Transit City light rail lines.

But unlike Transit City, which is supposed to extend light rail into the recesses of suburban Toronto, the 401RT concept doesn’t have the same city-building potential, argues TTC chair Adam Giambrone.

He espouses the power of light rail to transform neighbourhoods by contributing to higher densities of housing and jobs, building pedestrian traffic that makes for lively neighbourhoods.

“Those cars were fed to that (highway) corridor,” he said. “They came in on streets. The goal here is to make transit accessible by pedestrian measures so you can walk. If you have (transit) in a corridor like the 401 series highways or a hydro corridor, that becomes very difficult.”

It can be done. It is done. The TTC buses people to subways and expects to feed the Transit City lines with buses as well. It’s just not the preferred option, said Giambrone.

“You would miss all the walk-on traffic and all the streetscape possibilities,” he said.

You could do it but it would be a bad substitute for the kind of more localized higher order transit corridors he believes will succeed under Metrolinx.

From an environmental perspective, it already may be too late to change direction for something as radical as a 401RT, says Pollution Probe’s climate change program director.

Anything that gets people out of their cars is good, but given the time constraints, building on the existing transit network might be more practical, according to senior scientist Quentin Chiotti. “We basically have 10 to 15 years for the globe to turn around their whole emissions of greenhouse gases. If this doesn’t happen we’re in serious trouble. Twelve years (to build the RT) may be beginning to fall into that window, but just how much will that give us, given the investment?” he said. “Are there other ways of spending that $6 billion that’s going to give us more bang for the buck?”

In the Toronto region, freight has priority when it comes to the rails, said Chiotti.

“Can’t we do something about who has priority over the rail system? We have a system that is supposed to get people moving through the GTA but the system has a lot of barriers to operating as efficiently as possible,” he said.

“Instead of saying we should give transit a high priority, I think we need to look at the whole rail system and improve that so we have more dedicated lines for people movement and freight.”

What’s needed more than anything, Stillich said, is public understanding of all costs involved in the 401RT project. While people may wince at a $5.9 billion pricetag and losing a lane of highway traffic each way, he said they’re not aware of the true toll on the environment and economy of taking “inadequate and incremental steps” rather than embracing his “dramatic change” now.

“If things get so bad that everything is jammed every day, there’ll be more and more screaming that, no, we can’t do this construction and lose another lane because nothing will move,” Stillich said. “Something has to be done now to avoid the worst-case scenario.

“And, if you don’t do this, or this kind of thing, then nothing is going to move on the 401 anyway.”

Interactive map: 401 transit proposal

One lobby group says there’s a simple, cost-effective way of building a commuter rail line through our busiest highway. View an interactive map of the proposal.

AIRPORT LINK

Plans to build a long-awaited rail link from Union Station to Pearson airport would become redundant under the 401RT plan, according to SUDA.

To reach the airport, commuters could ride to the top of the Yonge or Spadina subway lines, and transfer to the 401RT. The last 7.7 kilometres of the route, beginning at Airport Rd. and Highway 409, would travel underground, passing directly below Pearson and ending at Hurontario St. in Mississauga.

Constructing this leg would cost an estimated $1.4 billion of the $5.9 billion budget.

OPTIONS

Elevated

Building an elevated rapid transit line can avoid the call to eliminate a lane for cars in each direction on Highways 401 and 409. If the goal is to avoid eliminating a lane for cars in each direction on Highways 401 and 409, it can be built as an elevated rapid transit line. Rising above existing bridges would send the train — and costs — way up.

Cost: An additional $1 billion, for a total of $6.9 billion.

Subway

The Sheppard subway, which runs for about five kilometres from Yonge St. to Don Mills Rd., could be extended east, to Scarborough City Centre. Using more costly tunneling, it could also be pushed west under and through Pearson International Airport and the surrounding area.

Cost: Estimated at more than $10 billion.

At-grade and subway

Placing most of the line at road level means much less tunneling or elevation, making this a cheaper option. It includes adding nearly 400 more buses to get more passengers to stations and intersects with subway, GO Transit and bus routes.

Cost: Estimated at $5.9 billion.

TRAVEL TIME

Stations would be two kilometres apart on average. That means trains could often move faster than cars on the congested highway. Travelling from Liverpool Rd. in Pickering at one end to Hurontario St., or Highway 10, in Mississauga at the other would take about 75 minutes. Travel from either end to Yonge St. would take 35 to 40 minutes.

TRANSIT CONNECTIONS

In addition to 15 more buses on most of the routes to the 28 proposed 401RT stations, the line would also connect with existing public transit lines, including:

• The Yonge subway line at Yonge St.

• The Spadina subway line at Yorkdale

• The Bloor-Danforth subway via the Scarborough Rapid Transit line at Scarborough Town Centre

• Etobicoke North GO station

Source: Sustainable Urban Development Association

– By Daniel Girard and Tess Kalinowski, Transportation Reporters for the Toronto Star