Cialis online Clomid online Viagra online

Archive for the ‘GTA’ category

The MILTON Tiger Cats? Oskee-wee-wee!

August 12th, 2010
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

Hamilton Tiger Cats owner Bob Young is threatening to move the CFL club out of Hamilton. Ward 6 candidate Mike Cluett believes Milton could be a viable alternative.

spacer

After months of debate, Hamilton City Councillors finally decided earlier this week on a location for the proposed stadium for the upcoming Toronto Pan Am Games – a stadium that will be funded by all three levels of government. Much to the dismay of current Tiger Cats owner Bob Young, it wasn’t the location he preferred, which has put the club’s long term future in Hamilton in some serious peril.

The City of Hamilton has decided on the West Harbour location, which seems to make sense as the city looks to revitalize the downtrodden core of this once thriving industrial hub. Young, who was prepared to cough up roughly $15 million of his own dough, was pushing for a location on the East Mountain, close to highways and the more affluent outlying, newer areas of the city.

A day before the official decision was made however, Young fired off an angry letter to Hamilton Mayor Fred Eisenberger and City Council pulling out of his involvement with the stadium, stating his regret that the Tiger Cats would be without a home after next season’s lease runs out at 80-year old Ivor Wynne Stadium.

Immediately sports prognosticators everywhere began to wonder just what will become of the historic franchise. Would next door neighbour Burlington build a stadium to house the team? Would Young look to move the club to the growing football hotbed of Quebec City or to the Maritimes in either Moncton or Halifax?

Well, Ward 6 candidate Mike Cluett thinks that Milton could be an option. Yes, Milton.

According to his Twitter account, Cluett met with Milton Mayor Gord Krantz about the possibility yesterday morning, and Krantz has apparently directed the appropriate Town staff to put together a proposal.

From Mike’s blog:

I talked directly with Milton Mayor Gord Krantz early this morning, he will be directing town staff and the economic development department to work on getting a preliminary proposal prepared for review and possibly present to the Pan Am officials and the Tiger Cats franchise.  The Town of Milton is no stranger to the Pan Am committee as just recently they were involved with other municipalities to look at Milton being an option to have locations for the Pan Am games in 2015.

He also explained how the idea of moving the CFL franchise to Milton might not be as far-fetched as you think.

The Town of Milton has the available land to house such a facility available for Pan Am officials and the Tiger Cats to consider. There are many benefits for all parties involved to consider Milton as a viable location for the Pan Am games AND becoming the new home for the Tiger Cats Franchise. The potential location would be on the west side of the 401 Industrial Park in Milton.

By having it there the games and the franchise have easy highway access to Toronto (45 minutes) downtown Kitchener / Waterloo / Cambridge (30 minutes) and residents of Hamilton as well (30 minutes)

Here’s how it can work.

Why Milton as a Pan Am Games partner?

  • Willing host
  • Proposed site could be easily rezoned for stadium purpose
  • Located 20 to 40 minutes from all other Pan Am Games venues
  • Located on west side of Greater Toronto Area
  • Located 20 minutes from Pearson International Airport
  • Proposed stadium site is located on with easy access to Highway 401, North America’s busiest superhighway
  • Proposed site alongside Highway 401 would make it highest visibility Pan Am venue in Canada
  • Located 20 minutes from Q.E.W. and 10 minutes from Highway 407
  • Located in an area with more than six million Ontarians
  • Well supported by local hotels, restaurants, general goods merchants and service industry; high-quality municipal services, well-trained workforce
  • Easy media access

Why Milton as a Hamilton Tiger-Cats partner?

  • Willing host
  • Most Milton CFL fans are Hamilton Tiger-Cat supporters
  • Proposed site could be easily rezoned for stadium purpose
  • Proposed site still reasonably close for many current seasons’ ticket holders to commute to
  • Proposed site alongside Highway 401 would make it highest visibility CFL stadium in Canada
  • Located 20 minutes from Pearson International Airport
  • Located on and easy access to Highway 401, North America’s busiest superhighway
  • Located 20 minutes from Q.E.W. and 10 minutes from Highway 407
  • Located in an area with more than six million Ontarians
  • Well supported by local hotels, restaurants, general goods merchants and service industry; high-quality municipal services, well-trained workforce
  • Easy media access

Why west side of 401 Industrial Park?

  • Proposed site could be easily rezoned for stadium purpose
  • Located 20 minutes from Pearson International Airport
  • Located on and easy access to Highway 401, North America’s busiest superhighway
  • Located 20 minutes from Q.E.W. and 10 minutes from Highway 407
  • Located in an area with more than six million Ontarians
  • Well supported by local hotels, restaurants, general goods merchants and service industry; high-quality municipal services, well-trained workforce

So what do you think? If the Tiger Cats were to leave Hamilton, would Milton be a viable option?

From my point of view, it may be worthwhile looking into — although a professional sports franchise situated in a city of 80,000 seems to be a bit of a stretch, even considering Milton’s current and future growth. The team and the Town of Milton would need to look at a few not-so-insignificant issues.

Where would the ‘new’ Tiger Cat fan base would come from and how they would get to Milton? Sure, there is land for a stadium and ample parking (revenues from which Mr. Young would like to pocket) which is a must given Milton’s location in terms of highway access. However, public transit targeted towards fans outside of the current Town is non-existent and the team would badly need to draw from Mississauga, Oakville, Burlington, Hamilton as well as Kitchener-Waterloo to make the franchise viable.

And by drawing fans from places like Oakville and Mississauga, is that starting to chip away at the existing Toronto Argonaut fan base, which is hardly consistent?

What about taxes? Milton residents have become accustomed to one of the lowest Municipal tax rates in the GTA (lower than only the City of Toronto we believe). What if taxes at the Municipal level were increased to fund the construction and ongoing maintenance of a brand new stadium which would essentially sit empty for the majority of the calendar year? It’s hard to think Milton’s relatively small tax base could take on such a burden without adjusting property taxes substantially upward, which is why I’m not sure operating a pro sports franchise in a small city is a wise thing. There is a reason only cities in the hundreds of thousands in population at minimum are considered as viable destinations for professional sports, other than simply stadium attendance.

Again, these are important things to consider and I assume no stone would be left unturned by the league, Bob Young and our faithful Town Councillors. However, that is the problem: this is the Town of Milton and the Canadian Football League we’re talking about here, which strangely makes me a little less confident in all of this.

One thing I want to make clear: I absolutely do not want to rain on Mr. Cluett’s parade — his enthusiasm for the Town of Milton, the Ti-Cats, the CFL and his efforts so far into investigating the possibilities here should be commended and applauded. I know Mike personally and he has no shortage of common sense. However, I think we all know how this one will play out.

This is pro sports — you know the formula: Rich owner needs a new stadium which will generate the increased revenues needed to make his franchise viable in the marketplace; rich owner solicits all levels of government to pay for said stadium and based on the outcome, decides how much (or how little) he/she will need to invest; if any hiccups are experienced, rich owner holds the current city/market hostage, threatens to move the franchise to a new, more viable city/market; said ultimatum tugs at the heart strings of residents/politicians; the city/market caves to appease rich owner and voila, everyone ends up happy as the [insert storied franchise here] stays in town to play in their brand new publically-funded stadium and rich owner lives happily ever after.

Essentially what worries me is that Milton residents will get all excited about the possibility of actually having their very own CFL franchise and spend a lot of time and money in figuring out how to make it work, only to realize down the road that acquiring the Tiger Cats was never realistic and that Milton was nothing more than a bargaining chip for the league and Mr. Young.

In the meantime, we will watch with much interest to see what the Town will come up with and where the City of Hamilton goes from here — could they possibly bow down to Mr. Young and reverse their decision and opt to build the new stadium out on the East Mountain after all?

My message to Mr. Young would be this: If you pay for the stadium, guess what? You get to decide where to build it. Stop holding Hamilton, Milton (and whomever else wants to get involved) hostage.

Stay tuned. And pass the popcorn.

Comments on this story are moderated

Milton Urban Planning Fails: Beautification

June 2nd, 2010
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

The intersection of Derry and Trudeau in Hawthorne Village, Milton. Beautification? Check.

Recently, local blogger and candidate for Milton Town Council in Ward 8, Zeeshan Hamid has strung together a series of posts discussing the ‘beautification’ or lack thereof, in Milton.

Hamid makes the case that Milton should position itself as an ‘Escarpment Community’ and that it’s future development and infill projects should take this into consideration. He’s essentially saying that Milton, from an urban planning and design standpoint, needs to separate itself from the rest of the urban sprawl west of Toronto.

Yes, this means you, Mississauga, Brampton and Oakville (north of the QEW, at least).

He’s correct. Oakville has Lake Ontario and by extension it’s signature Lakeshore Boulevard strip with its quaint shopping, restaurants, parks, etc. Mississauga has the lake as well and in addition, has more of a ‘big city’ downtown in the vicinity of Square One. Not all that great to some, but the city has become a major Canadian business centre because of it. Brampton has, well, um, not much. Sorry.

Moving west, the intersection of Derry and Holly has hanging pots of flowers.

Milton? Well, we’ve got a lot going for us.

We’re a small but growing town nestled in at the foot of the scenic Niagara Escarpment. The town’s amenities have increased ten-fold in the past decade and yet the downtown core — albeit not to be confused with Lakeshore Boulevard in Oakville — is quaint, somewhat scenic and is home to events such as this weekend’s Downtown Street Festival and the weekly Farmer’s Market. Milton is also a hop, step and a jump away from any number of conservation areas and farms with recreational opportunities abound, unlike Mississauga and Oakville.

Milton truly is a place where city meets country — and that’s a unique and strong selling point, especially in the GTA. With controlled growth and a little extra attention to detail, Milton was in a position years ago to truly become the jewel of the GTA. Seriously.

And how are we doing?

So far, not great.

Okay, Milton’s expansion hasn’t gone horribly mind you (we’ll talk traffic at another time), but things could have been better.

In Milton's newest development, Hawthorne Village on the Escarpment, things are looking a little bland.

Zeeshan is right — situated against Ontario’s most prominent geographical feature, the Niagara Escarpment, Milton should absolutely be positioning itself as a special place to be — an ‘Escarpment Community’ as he has coined it. A community where, from a design point of view at least, a little bit of that rural touch is brought in to soften the hard visuals of wider roads and new subdivisions.

The new housing developments themselves aren’t too bad. Hawthorne Village in the town’s southeast corner, is a decent-looking community with a nice mix of different sized houses and some nice designs. Well-done Mattamy. If you drive around in the older areas of Hawthorne Village where the trees have had 7+ years to grow, the streets actually have quite a nice character to them.

HV’s signature intersection of Derry and Trudeau was also well-executed from an ‘Escarpment Community’ standpoint as Zeeshan pointed out, with a good-looking median lined with trees and flowers. Is it a coincidence that Mattamy has their main Milton office situated on this corner? Probably not.

At any rate, most of Hawthorne Village, from a housing standpoint, was decently thought out. As you head west however, it’s a different story, and again, the Z-man nailed it with his recent assessment that the urban design is indeed regressing as you head toward the escarpment.

The Derry/Holly intersection has a concrete median with hanging flower pots. Trees and planted flowers would have been better, yes, but there was at least some attempt at beautification. However, moving into Milton’s newest area of development, Hawthorne Village on the Escarpment, it leaves us not only wanting more, but also disappointed.

I remember when Mattamy and other new home builders announced their plans to develop the land to the west of the existing town — I assumed these new developments would be pricey and exclusive and of the highest standard of both design and quality, given their proximity to the escarpment.

I was wrong.

The Hawthorne Village on the Escarpment area south of Derry and west of the CN Rail tracks is simply sub-par given it’s proximity to and sightlines of the escarpment and even in comparison to Mattamy’s earlier work in the east of town.

I don’t mean to dump on Mattamy or HVE residents here — I don’t know design-wise how much of this is in the hands of the builders or whether it’s the town needing to simply demand more from land developers. At any rate, there are a ton of large, exclusive homes in this area, but they are simply ridiculously sandwiched together on narrow, congested streets — even by today’s development standards — that the overall ‘look’ is simply not up to snuff.

And comparing the major intersections — Scott and Derry for example, leaves a lot to be desired in comparison to Holly/Derry and Trudeau/Derry. Overall, the development looks rushed and not well thought out — very ‘anti-Escarpment Community’ — not good considering it’s unfortunately ironic placement.

You also need to look at the new shopping plazas in town. Not a pleasant sight for the most part. Very wide open, lots of concrete and again, you get the feeling there was zero thought put into the design here. The Metro Plaza at Thompson and Louis St. Laurent has ‘urban sprawl’ written all over it. The Superstore plaza beside the GO Station? Well, that’s simply too much of a disaster to go into at this point, as is the whole intersection of Thompson and Main Streets — let’s save that one for another day.

So what types of things does Milton need to consider — from an urban design point of view — moving forward?

I believe Milton needs to position itself right now as the ‘Escarpment Community’ where urban and rural living collide.

In future new development and infill projects, some care absolutely needs to be taken to try to beautify the town where possible and begin to try to set it apart from neighbouring cities.

Newly built major roads and intersections, especially those leading in and out of town absolutely should have medians that allow for trees, plants and flowers. Let’s not forget about pine trees or cedars as well which maintain their look throughout our long winters.

Speaking of major roads, let’s do our best to keep homes from facing onto major arteries like Derry Road, and where homes do face onto major roads, let’s allow for trees as a buffer. Forget about fences — an ‘Escarpment Community’ needs to incorporate nature and natural elements as much as possible.

And speaking of ‘buffer zones’, let’s work on our shopping plazas and business centers. If parking lots need to face out to roads, can trees be planted to hide the sea of concrete from view? What about trying to get some storefronts facing out towards the road instead of toward the inner parking lot? Wouldn’t it look so much better to drive along roads like Derry or Bronte and see storefronts, trees, sidewalks and benches instead of bland back entrances, garbage bins or parking lots? Can we not try to avoid unmitigated disasters like the townhomes on Kennedy Circle that have the arse-end of the Metro Plaza stores staring back at them in their living rooms? Of course we can.

Infill is critical as well. Here’s hoping this type of care and consideration is also taken when the design and planning of future projects in ‘Old Milton’ takes place in areas such as Main Street east of downtown. I think we can all agree that most of that area of Main St. — lined with industrial plazas — is hardly befitting of an ‘Escarpment Community.’ Ditto for most of Ontario St. and Steeles Ave. — both major arteries for visitors or passersby through Milton. If your impression of our town was based on the beautification or lack thereof along these routes, you probably wouldn’t be too anxious to move to Milton.

Granted, these areas aren’t likely to be transformed easily if at all, but any infill projects planned here in the future should take this into consideration. Even much of the industrial area along Steeles could be softened if trees could be added to the sides of the road.

Honestly, I think the formula is pretty simple. Urban sprawl such as what Milton has experienced over the past decade, seems to be synonymous with open, bland spaces and lots of concrete. If nothing else, the thought process from now on should be: when in doubt — trees, trees and more trees. Oh, and plants and flowers too.

You get the point. Milton has a lot to be proud of — it’s geographical location included. I think it’s time that the town seriously considers trying to capture a sense of that as it continues to grow. This isn’t about property values, it’s about pride. It’s about making Milton a special place to be. Milton should (and still could) be the jewel of the GTA.

The disturbing thing for me, is the fact that the town was essentially a blank canvas a decade ago. As Zeeshan has pointed out, no one bothered to look at the mistakes made by other Municipalities like Mississauga, Oakville or Brampton in their years of aggressive development — or even the successes for that matter (speaking specifically of Mississauga’s policy of infrastructure before population growth). And now, here we sit feeling the brunt of some of the decisions made years ago with little thought given to any sort of vision for Milton’s future.

Who’s to blame? I’m sure you could come up with a laundry list of people, politicians and organizations, but at this point I think it’s best to look to the future.

Milton’s rapid expansion has still only barely begun and there is still plenty of time to right some of the previous wrongs with regard to urban planning and design — as well as continue to improve older areas via sensible infill strategies.

I’ve been saying it for years: this is a pivotal time in the history of this town. Don’t be afraid to voice your opinions, concerns and support for the candidates you think can help achieve the vision you have for Milton.

That’s right, this is yet another call for voter turnout in this Fall’s Municipal election. It’s time for us to get actively involved in shaping Milton.

Should Milton be satisfied with simply becoming another generic GTA suburb, or do we take steps to make our town a special, desirable place that is unique and stands out?

I knew you’d agree with me. The time is now.

Milton Urban Planning Fails is a regular feature on MiltonSearch.com.

Comments on this story are moderated

How to get the 905 to love road tolls

March 25th, 2010
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

Milton commuters: would you be more inclined to pay road tolls if the funds went toward improvements to GO Transit rather than the TTC?

Milton commuters: would you be more inclined to pay road tolls if the funds went toward improvements to GO Transit rather than the TTC?

Jim Tovey’s article today in the Toronto Star’s Your City My City section had an interesting take on the concept of toll roads in Toronto.

I’ve always had a hunch that highways such as the Gardiner Expressway and 401 would ultimately end up as toll roads — at least for those in Toronto’s suburbs, better known as “the 905.” With so much traffic on Toronto’s highways coming from commuters not contributing taxes towards Canada’s largest city, it makes sense for the City of Toronto to want to try to claim a proverbial ‘pound of flesh’ from those who reside outside the fair city but are more than happy to make a living there.

We all know how supposedly underfunded the TTC is, and it’s always been assumed the funds from such tolls would go straight to the City of Toronto’s own transit system. I’m sure they do need the funding, but what do you think the odds are of the TTC expanding into the 905 anytime soon?

The answer: don’t hold your breath.

Mr. Tovey makes the case that it would be much easier for Toronto’s suburbanite commuters to accept road tolls if the proceeds went to Metrolinx, in an effort to make improvements (and maybe reduce costs, right Mr. Salmons?) to GO Transit — the other option for traveling into the city for 905 commuters.

What do you think? If the 401 and Gardiner were toll roads, would you continue driving into Toronto on those roads, would you start taking GO Transit if you aren’t already (assuming that’s a viable option) and does it matter into which coffers the toll road profits end up?

Here is Mr. Tovey’s post:

Would those of us in the 905 ante up $5 for the privilege of sitting on the Gardiner Expressway two hours a day? Particularly if the five bucks was going to expand the Toronto subway system? The short answer, if the poll was strictly 905, is absolutely not!

If the question was slightly different the answer may be the reverse.

I avoid driving into Toronto. The last time I was forced into daily trips for work was five winters ago while restoring a house in Rosedale. Toronto is not particularly truck friendly, parking is restricted and the Green Hornets seem to stake out residential construction sites.

The trip, from home in south east Mississauga was 1 to 1 ½ hours each way, gas was about $120 a week, parking tickets $25 to $50 weekly. Any fiscally responsible contractor has to build this cost into the contract, so in this situation the extra $10 daily would be born by a Toronto resident.

Therefore, if the funding from tolls goes to the Toronto Transit Commission, that’s fine. Personally, I chose to work closer to home. Most people who make this daily pilgrimage do not have the luxury of a choice.

As chair of the Legacy Foundation, I often go to Toronto for meetings and I always take the GO train.

Herein lies the problem for a 905er with the funding going to subway expansions.

The Long Branch GO station is a mile and a half from my house at Cawthra and Lakeshore. The GO parking lot is continually full and street parking is impossible, which leaves Mississauga Transit the only option.

Here is how the trip plays out. I dutifully wait for Mississauga Transit, until I get bored, which takes five minutes, and then I walk east towards Long Branch. The Mississauga Transit bus usually passes me when I am within 200 metres of the GO station. Clearly an improved subway system in Toronto is not going to alleviate the challenge of getting people in the 905 out of cars and into transit. Toll fees directed to that end will not engender buy-in from anyone outside of Toronto.

From a 905 perspective, if the funding were going to Metrolinx to harmonize public transportation on a regional basis, I believe there would be wide support for tolls.

Transit in the GTA has traditionally taken a fortress mentality, there have been pitched battles in the past over the use of bus stops, and municipal schedules rarely connect. The problem is not so much public transit in Toronto; the problem for us is getting to it. Metrolinx was established to solve this dilemma and they have an expansive plan, “The Big Move”, to resolve this disparity.

Use the toll money for regionally improved, frequent service and I might occasionally take the car downtown just so I can contribute my $5.

Comments on this story are moderated

Petition Against 5% Increase in GO Transit Fares for 2010

February 14th, 2010
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

GO Transit has announced that yet again during a recession, they plan to raise fares by 5% in 2010.

GO Transit has announced that yet again during a recession, they plan to raise fares by 5% in 2010.

As he was a year ago, Milton resident Andrew Salmons is all over GO Transit’s recent announcement that they will yet again raise fares by 5% for 2010.

I’d have to agree with Mr. Salmons on this one. During not only a recession, but a supposed environmental crisis — not to mention the traffic issues faced daily by GTA commuters — this is absolutely the wrong decision by GO.

I realize GO is continuing to make improvements and additions to their service, but it’s wrong to hit riders with this increase, especially with so many experiencing either wage freezes or taking pay cuts in the past year thanks to the state of the world economy.

In my mind, it would make sense for GO to keep costs down as much as possible so that taking transit becomes a ‘no-brainer’ for commuters. There would probably be an increase in ridership which would fund planned improvements and growth. And if funding falls a little short, well, the government seems to be more than willing to throw around stimulus money these days… Wouldn’t appeasing the huge number of GO commuters be seen as ‘low hanging fruit’ by the Provincial Government?

Are you a user of GO Transit? If so, we would encourage you to do your part by signing the online petition we received from Andrew Salmons via email.

Will this change anything? More than likely not, but I think it’s important for GO to see where it’s riders stand on this announcement and also read your comments and suggestions.

From Andrew Salmons:

GO Transit has done it again! They are increasing your monthly pass rate by 5% again this year, on top of the 5% increase last year. That is a 10% increase in just 2 years, while annual inflation is 1.2% as of December 2009, and was 1.3% as of March 2009.

To put the latest 5% increase in perspective:

A rider traveling from Milton to Union will now pay $272 per month from $260 in 2009, $250 in 2008, and $246 in 2007. 8.8% increase since March 2008.

A rider traveling from Oakville to Union will now pay $214.50 per month from $205 in 2009, and $195 in 2008. 10% increase since March 2008.

Add your name to petition the Legislative Assembly of Ontario to (1) reduce GO Transit fares to be inline with inflation since 2007, (2) conduct a complete review GO Transit’s operating expenses and contracts, and (3) develop and implement a strategy for economically sustainable and affordable transit in Ontario.

I ask you for your support and ask you add your name this year’s petition against the fare increase.

Please sign here

Feel free to forward this petition to your friends, co-workers, and family, and your Member of Provincial Parliament.

Thank you for your support!

Comments on this story are moderated

Halton looking to protect 36% of its developable land

December 17th, 2009
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

Burlington farmer James Fisher says a natural heritage designation will inevitably put agricultural interests behind environmental concerns.

Burlington farmer James Fisher says a natural heritage designation will inevitably put agricultural interests behind environmental concerns.

Kudos to Halton Region, which is finally looking to limit development after a huge amount of some of Ontario’s finest farmland has already been or is planned to be developed on.

This will be interesting to watch as the situation pits green politicians vs. rural politicians supporting farmers vs. farmers who want to sell their land to developers vs. farmers who want to preserve Halton’s rich farmland.

You may also want to read two other articles posted previously on MiltonSearch.com: Strawberry Fields (not) Forever and A Farewell to Farms.

Below is an overview of Halton Region and its land designations. Click the image for an enlarged, interactive version.

Here is this latest column in it’s entirety from the Toronto Star:

Where Homes Don’t Grow

Halton’s radical plan to limit development pits red-taped farmers against green politicians

Outspoken Oakville councillor Allan Elgar has a name for the practice of building a sprawling subdivision on prime farmland: He calls it “the final crop.”

That’s why the farmboy-turned-environmentalist is backing Halton Region’s groundbreaking proposal to set its own protections on an extensive natural heritage system. The plan would preserve a whopping 36 per cent of the region’s developable land, set up an integrated network of preserved areas, and drastically curtail where houses can be planted some day.

The land included is neither part of the protected greenbelt and Niagara Escarpment nor under consideration for development.

But the move is pitting green-minded politicians in Oakville and Burlington against those in Halton Hills and Milton, who are more responsive to concerns raised by farmers and development interests and have opposed it. A final vote is slated for Dec. 16.

Supporters make no bones about the fact the plan will thwart speculators who have bought, or arranged to buy, vast hectares of prime agricultural land in Halton, and the farmers who want to sell it.

Caught in the crossfire, however, are farmers who don’t want to sell but are deeply concerned that the new designation will add another layer of regulation that bodes ill for farming in the long run.

It is, contends James Fisher, all about how words are interpreted.

“The actual designation has negative impact,” said Fisher, one of several farmers who spoke to Halton regional council this week. “It’s not that we are against the natural heritage system. We want an alternative that respects agriculture.”

They fear that replacing the current agricultural zoning with the term “natural heritage” will inevitably put farming interests behind environmental concerns, despite repeated assurances that farming will always be allowed.

Farmers want, at a minimum, to see the natural heritage system designated as preserving both environmental features and agriculture.

Whatever the final wording, Elgar and most of the Halton councillors seem ready to approve the creation of a vast “systems-based” network of natural heritage corridors to connect environmentally sensitive areas such as river valleys, woodlots and wetlands.

It would end the old practice of protecting only isolated pockets, which tend to degrade over time if there are no corridors ensuring that wildlife can move freely.

The proposal may be more radical than the provincial greenbelt legislation because it bans golf courses anywhere on the system, whereas the province just blocks golf courses from prime agricultural land.

“If we get this, we will be the first region in the Greater Toronto Area with a systems-based approach on a regional basis,” said Elgar, describing the preservation plan as simply an extra layer of protection.

“It is a no-touch zone … There is concern that there is a lot of farming land bought by the development industry, with the hope in future of flipping it to plant houses.”

The plan would not only make protected areas off-limits but also make anything built within 120 metres of a natural heritage feature or corridor subject to an environmental impact assessment – a proposition feared both by developers and farmers who want to make improvements to their property.

While other GTA municipalities are also doing more long-range development planning now, Halton’s scheme is the most ambitious.

In the face of similar opposition, Peel Region politicians recently deferred a decision on their own plan, which targets mostly farmland in Brampton and Caledon. Peel’s plan is less stringent than Halton’s – it has been slammed by the Sierra Club for example, for allowing golf courses to be built in the valley lands of its waterways.

Halton politicians could take courage from an Ontario Municipal Board ruling last year that approved Oakville’s controversial decision to protect 900 hectares on its own initiative. The preservation area – won after a decade-long tussle with the development industry – represents more than one-third of the 3,400 hectares of undeveloped land north of Dundas St. W.

The OMB ruling was a major victory for the likes of Elgar, Oakville Mayor Rob Burton and members of the environmental group Oakvillegreen, who had fought to preserve green space in north Oakville while making room for an eventual population of more than 50,000.

The ruling also emboldened them and other Halton Region politicians to go after developers for thousands of dollars in extra development charges on each home sold – significantly higher than other regions – under the mantra that “growth must pay for itself” and municipal government doesn’t exist to subsidize developer profits.

Halton Hills Councillor Clark Sommerville says the intention behind the natural heritage system proposal is good – and driven by urban councillors from Oakville and Burlington who are trying to make amends for the fact their communities were largely built out before such protections existed.

But he thinks it’s “overkill.”

No matter how well-intentioned, overregulation “will be the death knell of farming,” Somerville said – not development.

“The biggest thing we are trying to protect is the non-urban rural land from development, but the way it’s being written it almost appears that agriculture is the threat,” he said.

Still, environmentalists such as Liz Benneian of Oakvillegreen say the new rules will ensure protection for farmers. Her only concern is that a provision in the original plan – superimposing the natural heritage system on Greenbelt areas as a second layer of protection against a future change of heart by the province – has since been removed.

“We believe this is a forward-thinking plan from planners and politicians,” Benneian said. “A gift to our grandchildren.”

Comments on this story are moderated

The future of boys

October 22nd, 2009
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

The performance of boys in school has considerably declined over the years. Is the school system which seems to want them to act and learn like girls do, failing them?

The performance of boys in school has considerably declined over the years. Is the school system which seems to want them to act and learn like girls do, failing them?

Many have spent decades trying to address the barriers to women in education and in business. And in spite of the progress, there is more to be done.

At the same time, the gender gap cuts both ways.

Boys are less likely than girls to meet provincial standards in reading. Boys account for the majority of suspensions. And boys are more likely than girls to drop out of high school in Canada (12.2 per cent versus 7.2 per cent in 2004-05).

For a variety of reasons, boys are having a real struggle when it comes to education and learning, not the least of which may be the fact that instead of being treated as boys in our schools, they’re being looked at as ‘inadequate girls.’ Boys and girls for the most part, learn very differently. The ‘rules’ in today’s schools seem to work well for most female students, but it’s possible that they are not necessarily the right fit for many boys who seem to have a hard time conforming to the standard learning environment.

I see this every day as I have both a son and daughter — the differences between them and how to best communicate with them, are immense. Our daughter is very focused and listens well. Our son on the other hand, is easily distracted by many things and has a hard time sitting still for more than a few seconds at times.

Despite this lack of attention span, he is reading well beyond his current grade level, has an absolutely amazing memory for facts and details and has a strong hunger for information and to learn about many different topics like animals, science, space, the Earth and geography — and he has a strong comprehension of these concepts for his age.

Hence, I was happy to see that yesterday, the Toronto District School Board made an announcement that showed some real out-of-the-box thinking in regard to the issue of boys’ struggles in school.

From MetroNews.ca:

In a bold move announced this week, the Toronto District School Board’s new director Chris Spence announced a strategy that includes a “Male Leadership Academy” for boys as well as male-friendly demonstration classrooms aimed at boosting boys’ school performance.

Research by the Canadian Centre for Knowledge Mobilization in B.C. concluded that, overall, studies tend to show that single-sex schools serve girls better than boys. However, the majority of studies examine private schools dominated by students from wealthy well-educated families.

We also know there are too few male role models in the early grades.

“An excellent teacher can inspire any kid to love Shakespeare, but boys and girls do have different preferences. Same-sex classes in particular subjects allow gender specific content and teaching methods.”

Spence is drawing on his previous successes in the development of Boys 2 Men, Project G.O. (Girls Only) and the Read to Succeed Program, which motivates and teaches boys to read.

“While we should heed cautions against segregating and fragmenting our schools, and we need rigorous evaluation and accountability, we do need to try new approaches to adapt the curriculum, teaching methods and learning environment to the particular needs of boys and girls.”

I think this is a good start — again, we have to look at different ways in which we can help today’s boys succeed.

I first started thinking about this over a year ago, when Dr. Leonard Sax appeared on an episode of the overnight alternative radio program, Coast to Coast AM with host Ian Punnett, where he addressed this issue.

Dr. Sax’s unusual background — being both a family physician (M.D.), as well as a Ph.D. psychologist — has led him to recognize the importance of gender differences in how children learn, and to a belief that those gender differences are neglected or minimized in American public schools. Here’s one example cited on his bio page:

Consider the typical first or second-grade classroom. Imagine Justin, six years old, sitting at the back of the class. The teacher (a woman) is speaking in a tone of voice which seems normal to her. Justin, however, barely hears her. Instead, he’s staring out the window, or looking at a fly on the ceiling. The teacher recognizes that Justin isn’t paying attention. Justin is demonstrating a deficit of attention. The teacher may reasonably wonder whether Justin perhaps has attention deficit disorder.

That’s actually one avenue which led to my interest in this topic, about ten years ago. I saw this parade of 6 and 7 year-old boys being marched into my office, with Mom clutching a note from the school which read: “Please evaluate Justin for ADD. Would he benefit from medication?” After evaluating such a boy, I found in some cases that the problem was not so much with the boy, but with the school… specifically, with the school’s failure to recognize the differences in the auditory acuity of boys and girls, and the school’s failure to recognize the differences in the developmental timetables of boys and girls.

Dr. Sax was on the show to promote his book, Boys Adrift: A doctor’s plan to help our sons fulfill their potential. In the book, he talks about how a third of men ages 22–34 are still living at home with their parents — about a 100 percent increase in the past twenty years. Parents, teachers, and mental health professionals are worried about boys, but no one has come up with good reasons for their decline, or thought about any workable solutions to reverse this troubling trend.

In the book, Dr. Sax offers a wide range of possible remedies — including innovative ways parents can wean their sons away from video games, practical steps they can take to improve their sons’ schooling, and surprisingly simple life changes they can make to protect boys from the environmental estrogens that undermine boys’ motivation.

Environmental estrogrens you ask?

Dr. Sax also discussed fertility when he appeared on Coast to Coast AM in a three-hour interview, as well as the various factors contributing to the steady decline of performance, ambition and motivation in America’s boys and young men (Even though his research is U.S. based, I think it’s safe to draw parallels to boys here in Southern Ontario).

From Coast to Coast AM:

Sperm counts and testosterone levels of young men in the United States have declined substantially over the past 50 years, Sax reported. Environmental estrogens from clear plastic-bottled drinks may be partially to blame. According to Sax, consuming only two bottles of water provides about the same amount of estrogen as found in a birth control pill. The elevated estrogen intake may be lowering testosterone levels in men, causing them to lose motivation to do anything, Sax added.

To make matters worse, boys are no longer allowed to be boys at school, he said. ‘Violent’ masculine activities such as dodge ball and snowball fights are prohibited at many schools, Sax pointed out, noting that boys are encouraged to “be more like girls.” Typical male conduct at school is often altered with behavior medication, Sax said, which can also damage the motivational centers in boys’ brains.

Sax also thinks that accelerated early education programs/curriculum ignore important gender differences and end up creating academic environments that do not appeal to boys. Unmotivated to pursue academic excellence and other real-world goals, these boys find contentment in video games and online pornography. For them, what happens in the “virtual world is more important than the real world,” Sax said.

My interest in this stems from already noticing many of these learning challenges with our young son, just starting out on his journey through our education system here in Milton. I have not yet purchased or read Dr. Sax’s book, but he made some great points in his interview and we definitely want to arm ourselves with as many resources, ideas and strategies as possible to help our very intelligent (and very distracted) son succeed and excel in school.

I hope the sharing of this info is helpful to others with boys of all ages and I think this new strategy announced by the Toronto District School Board is worth watching closely.

Comments on this story are moderated

Did the store overcharge you? No need to fret

October 17th, 2009
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

In many cases, that error is worth $10

Few consumers are aware of a national program that compensates those who have been charged the wrong price.

Few consumers are aware of a national program that compensates those who have been charged the wrong price.

Many shoppers simply aren’t aware that there is indeed something you can do if you are incorrectly charged for an item when its bar code is scanned.

The old Milton A&P grocery store at Ontario/Laurier (now a Food Basics, with the A&P now a Metro Store at Thompson/Kennedy Circle) always had a policy of giving you said item for free (up to a certain dollar amount) if you were mischarged for it — a policy I took advantage of several times over the last decade or so.

I haven’t thought too much about this in awhile, but a recent Toronto Star article highlighted the fact that there is actually a national program protecting consumers against overcharging by stores.

In general terms, participating retailers are required to give you items that you have been overcharged, for free if they’re under $10 — and $10 off items above that price.

So, next time you either see the wrong price come up at the checkout, or upon a closer look at your receipt at home, don’t be afraid to challenge it. You’re probably going to get some nasty looks from the employees at said store as I have over the years (I have no idea why — it’s not like it’s anything to do with them or their performance), but it could mean $10 in your pocket.

Below is the article which includes further details.

It used to steam me up: I’d get home after a big shopping trip, only to look at the receipt and realize I’d paid full price for those granola bars – or whatever – that had been advertised on sale. A matter of just a few dollars, mind you, but it still felt like a rip-off.

Little did I know, those granola bars didn’t have to cost me a thing.

You, too, could save – up to $10 on each item – if you are overcharged on your next trip to the store.

Or not, if you aren’t aware – as I wasn’t – of a national program that compensates customers who have been charged the wrong price by automatically giving them the item incorrectly scanned for free.

Yes, free.

Since 2002, stores that have signed on to a program called the Scanner Price Accuracy Voluntary Code that will give you an incorrectly priced item free, if that item costs less than $10. If it costs more, you get $10 off the correct price.

If you buy a bunch of the same, incorrectly priced thing, only the first unit purchased qualifies.

There are more than 8,000 participating locations across Canada.

The $10 code was developed as a way to maintain consumers’ faith in the retail system, says communications director Mark Beazley of the industry group Retail Council of Canada, which, along with other groups representing grocery and drug stores, administers the code.

“Although retailers strive to be accurate in scanner pricing, errors can occur in the system,” Beazley says. Errors such as an item that has the wrong label or is scanned incorrectly at the checkout. The code is a simple and effective way for customers to have those errors corrected, Beazley says.

Except that customers we spoke to had never heard of the code, despite shopping at participating chains.

“I can tell you in my case, definitely, I wasn’t aware there was such a thing,” says Sonya Kladich who was checking over her bill in a west-end grocery store parking lot.

“I am the worst when it comes to (checking prices),” she says, adding that she has been burned in the past by one chain that does not subscribe to the code and now keeps an eye out when shopping there.

Fred Vella, 73, also didn’t know about the code.

“If they charge me too much, I go back to the store for an adjustment,” he says, pushing a Loblaw’s cart holding two bags of flour, canned soup and some yogurt that had been discounted for quick sale.

“It’s an inconvenience, eh? I have to drive back to the store from home.” (Customers can also call a toll-free complaint line set up by the Retail Council of Canada.)

Savvy shoppers on the deal-spotting site www.SmartCanucks.ca know about the code, but a recent discussion suggests a level of confusion over how it works. Some members thought it was universal among Canadian retailers.

Vella says he wouldn’t think to demand his money back, which is typical, says Mel Fruitman, vice-president of the advocacy group Consumers Association of Canada.

“It’s not in the Canadian psyche,” Fruitman says. “We don’t stand up for ourselves like we should.

Fruitman says the Retail Council doesn’t go far enough in making the public aware of the seven-year-old code – “It’s sort of just sitting there,” he says – and recommends more signage.

Beazley says a survey of 255 stores conducted for the Retail Council showed 87 per cent were well-versed in the code and 84 per cent had signs displayed at every checkout and entrance.

Customers with a complaint can call the store directly or call a complaint hotline at 1-866-499-4599.

“I don’t think you can jump to the conclusion this is showing an increase in the number of errors,” Beazley says. “It may just be that consumers are more aware of the actual program.”

All the complaints phoned in last year were resolved, Beazley says.

Fruitman says, with our reliance on technology, it may not occur to many customers to double-check their bill.

“Most consumers accept that we’re in an electronic world and don’t think too much about it anymore,” he says.

The Customer is Always Right

When errors occur, it is usually in the customer’s favour, according to an audit commissioned by retailers that participate in the Scanner Price Accuracy Voluntary Code. Several objective audits of stores’ compliance with the code have been conducted by market researcher The Nielsen Company. In 2008, auditors visited 351 stores and tracked 35,100 scanned items, representing $284, 377 in retail sales.

The study found:
* About 59 per cent of errors favour the customer.
* The error rate is about 2.90 per cent.
* The value of the average error is $0.23 (+/-)
* 67 per cent of errors are owing to the shelf tag price being incorrect.
* 2 per cent of errors are owing to the barcode scanning incorrectly.

Source: Scanner Price Accuracy Voluntary Code Associations’ Annual Report to the Competition Bureau (2008)

Comments on this story are moderated

Jim Kenzie’s Top 10 ways to fix the roads

September 21st, 2009
Email This Post Email This PostspacerPrint This Post Print This Post

spacer

Heres a recipe for confusion: why are the exit roads listed next to the arrow going straight ahead, instead of on the right-hand side.

Here's a recipe for confusion: why are the exit roads listed next to the arrow going straight ahead, instead of on the right-hand side.

From Wheels.ca:

Wheels’ top correspondant Jim Kenzie, gives his top prescription for fixing the roadways

Why are our roads so bad?

We are constantly being told by our government that we have the best, safest roads anywhere.

So how come we are always whining about them?

Hard as it may be for you to believe, I have some opinions on how they could be improved.

And yes, somebody did ask.

So here are my Top 10 suggestions. (As always, your recommendations are welcome too.)

1. Fix the lane markings.

No prizes for guessing this would be my No.1.

The right lane is the driving lane, embedded in tradition, good manners, logic and the law.

So why does it keep disappearing?

You should be able to get into the right lane of Hwy.401 coming out of the customs booth in Windsor, drive to the Quebec border and never have to use your turn signal to change lanes.

Unless you want to, of course.

The right lane should NEVER merge into the middle or left lanes – on a municipal road or a highway. The right lane should NEVER become an off-ramp.

These designs scare people into staying in the middle or left lanes, where they impede the progress of other traffic.

They also confuse everyone, especially visitors who don’t know the local lay of the land. One should not require “local knowledge” to drive safely.

The sanctity of the right lane is an international standard; adhering to it makes our roads safer.

So why do our road designers violate this standard so regularly?

Grow lanes to the left, Shrink lanes from the left and add off-ramps to the right.

On-ramps should merge with the driving lane after a suitable distance to allow for acceleration.

Couldn’t be much simpler.

This is not only my No.1 beef, it would be dead-simple and dead-cheap to fix. A few weekends and a few hundred litres of line paint, and we’re done.

I don’t get it.

2. Tell people about this

Once the above has been accomplished (I’m not holding my breath…) then every overpass on the highway – every single one of them – should have a sign saying something to the effect: “Keep Right Except to Pass”; “All Traffic Keep Right” (not “Slower Traffic Keep Right”, because nobody wants to think of themselves as being “slower”); or, “Hey you in the blue Tempo – this means you!”

If it would be too expensive, get Coca-Cola or the Winter Olympics or somebody to sponsor the signage.

I’m sure you’d have no trouble selling the space – think of the eyeballs they could reach.

So, we’d have safer traffic, and balance the budget too.

Win-win, sez I.

3. Build more roundabouts

The benefits of roundabouts – improved traffic safety, improved efficiency, reduced pollution, reduced fuel consumption – are just so obvious, and proven everywhere they’ve been tried (yes, even right here in Canada, next door in Waterloo Region) that it boggles the mind that we don’t have them everywhere.

If we were to retrofit every intersection that should have one, this would be more complicated and more expensive than repainting the lane markings.

But with the pace of road building going on these days, all we need is a commitment that they are the future. Then every time an intersection needed to be rebuilt, we’d get another of the most effective traffic management devices ever invented.

How tough is this to understand?

4. Fewer stop signs

For the same reasons roundabouts are brilliant, stop signs are stupid.

The objective of stop signs is to avoid T-bone crashes at intersections.

But there is no reason whatsoever why you have to come to a complete stop in order to accomplish this important but easily attained objective.

The British manage quite well by treating virtually every intersection as a Yield, rather than a Stop.

Why can’t we?

5. Fix the construction zone markings

They’ve actually made some progress on this one, with the orange lane markings they are now using in some places on the interminable and omnipresent construction zones on the 401.

But the old ones were completely invisible at night, and in the rain, you couldn’t tell the construction markings from the old ones.

Scary.

6. Demand a warranty on road repairs

While on the subject of construction, does it not appear to you that the same chunks of road are constantly being rebuilt?

When they are newly finished, the surface is smooth, it looks great and it drives great.

But – and I appreciate this may largely be my imagination – it seems that a couple of years later (I almost wrote “a couple of years down the road,” but even I have some standards…) the same stretch of road is all being torn up again.

I imagine there must be some sort of expected life-span on newly built (or rebuilt) highways.

I also understand better roads cost more, and maybe the construction companies hog-tied by onerous contract limitations, or have to bid low to get the job.

I have read that concrete highways last longer than asphalt, but they aren’t as comfortable to drive on, at least not initially, due to the bump-thump caused by the expansion joints.

It must be a complex business.

But do road-building companies offer any kind of warranty on their work? Does anybody track how the road deteriorates? If it falls apart prematurely, shouldn’t they be forced to fix it at their expense?

7. Fix the highway exit signs

What genius came up with the exit signs on the 401?

Typically, they have a single arrow on the left, pointing straight ahead, and a double-headed arrow to the right, with one of the points going straight ahead, and the other aiming off to the right, presumably indicating the exit.

So, where do they put the name which identifies the street you’re exiting to?

Not beside the arrow pointing to the exit. That would make too much sense.

They put it beside the solitary arrow which points straight ahead.

Which is exactly the direction you DON’T want to go to take the exit.

Sure, we have become used to this idiocy. The human machine is remarkably forgiving of bad design.

But why should we have to adapt? Why can’t we have good design to begin with?

8. Build more rest stops

Research has long shown that driving performance drops off remarkably after about two hours behind the wheel.

Your eyes get tired, your vision drops, and you cannot centre the car properly in the lane. The car tends to slew off the road – the classic “two-wheel shoulder drop-off.”

This typically scares the whee out of the driver. Again typically, the reaction is over-reaction, a violent steering manoeuvre which often causes the car to rocket across the road, leading to a roll-over in the median or, worse still, a head-on crash with another vehicle heading the other way.

One answer – the one the Ontario government chose when this issue came up a number of years ago following a coroner’s inquest into a spate of fatal crashes on the 401 between Trenton and Cornwall – was to build a wall in the median strip, so the inevitable crashes would become ricochets into the same lane, rather than head-ons or roll-overs.

A step, you should pardon the expression, in the right direction.

But hardly the answer.

Which, of course, is more rest stops, preferably situated every two hours or so along major highways, along with appropriate signage encouraging their use.

Maybe even a few picnic tables…

9. More rumble strips

Again, we’ve had some progress here, with these being quite common on the shoulders of the 401 and other major highways.

They give you a remarkably strong audible and sensory warning that you are about to leave the road with extreme prejudice, which is almost always a bad idea.

The same concept is also used to indicate the end of a freeway, or stop signs where you might not expect them.

Good idea.

Let’s have more.

10. Chevrons? Are you kidding me?

What road salt and snow plows have failed to accomplish, let’s complete the job by removing what’s left of those dumb chevrons on the freeways which were supposed to indicate how many car lengths you should leave between cars.

True, tailgating is dumb and dangerous.

But encouraging people to look down on the road surface instead of keeping their eyes up is 200 per cent the wrong thing to do.

Comments on this story are moderated