Archive for January, 2008

New Season of LOST Returns Thursday

Wednesday, January 30th, 2008

lost season 4

Are the island castaways of “Lost” mere hours from rescue? Or will their latest chance at freedom turn to dust, like all the others?

That’s a no-brainer. The title of the series isn’t “Found.” And as the long-awaited new season of “Lost” begins Thursday (9 p.m. CTV), the first episode strongly suggests the castaways are about to lose again.

They’re awaiting help from a rescue party from a freighter anchored offshore. But as they wait, the chilling likelihood takes hold that their potential saviors could instead spell their doom.

There are no shockers in the episode, the first of eight in the series’ truncated fourth season. But this is a gripping hour involving all the principal characters that sets the stage for the season ahead. And after eight long months’ absence, it’s a welcome sight. (Relax: No spoilers ahead.)

From last season’s finale, we already know that rock star Charlie (played by Dominic Monaghan) made a perilous quest to disable a jamming device that had prevented the group from summoning help from a just-acquired satellite telephone. He died carrying out his mission, but not before relaying a warning to his comrades to beware of the so-called freighter people.

The next step in the rescue plan was for the group to make a trek to the radio tower and shut off a tape-loop rescue plea that also was interfering with any other transmissions.

Ben (Michael Emerson), the less-than-trustworthy overlord of the others, implored Jack (Matthew Fox), the survivors’ reluctant leader, not to place the call to the freighter people.

Jack sneered at Ben’s words. The call was made, and the new episode begins, much as last season’s finale did, with Jack somewhere in the future; drinking. With this recently added flash-forward storytelling feature, Jack is seen in his Los Angeles kitchen mixing a morning cocktail when his eye falls on TV coverage of police in hot pursuit of a speeding motorist.

The car crashes and the driver is arrested. Jack realizes it’s one of his fellow former castaways, who is haunted by the past and sees visions of the dead. Jack, who himself is plagued by substance abuse and other demons, pays this person a visit. There is mention of a dreaded secret they share.

In a scene back on the island (and back in time), the portly Hurley (Jorge Garcia) runs into Locke (Terry O’Quinn), who long ago had “gone native” and has no desire to ever leave the island.

“It’s gonna be hard to talk (Jack) into thinking they’re not coming here to rescue us,” says Hurley, who, with Locke, shares Ben’s alarm for what the freighter people might do.

“We’re just gonna have to try our best,” says Locke, “because if we can’t talk him out of it, then Charlie died for nothing.”

By the end of the hour, the castaways are split into two factions; those aligned with Ben and Locke who believe the freighter people represent a mortal threat and Jack’s group, still holding out hope for rescue, even as they start to fear the worst.

Thursday’s new episode will be preceded by “Lost: Past, Present & Future,” a recap hour of the saga of the Oceanic flight 815 crash (8 p.m. CTV). And Wednesday, last season’s splendid two-hour finale will be repeated (9 p.m. CTV) in “enhanced” form, with on-screen text containing commentary and clues.

In short, “Lost” fans should be rejoicing. And even with just eight episodes currently on tap thanks to the writers strike, ABC has promised another 40 will eventually follow, leading up to the series’ finale in 2010.

The Milton Sports Guy handicaps the Conference Championships

Thursday, January 17th, 2008

Brett Favre is one win away from a Super Bowl berth

After the Packers’ convincing win vs. the Seahawks and because the Giants’ stunned Dallas, Favre and co. are one home win away from a berth in the Super Bowl.

Well, we’ve arrived at my second-favourite weekend of the NFL season, the Conference Championships (#1 is the divisional playoff weekend, ie. last weekend - 4 usually intriguing matchups over two days). I love the AFC and NFC Championship games because it usually involves two great teams facing each other, usually some kind of rivalry or history, and unlike the Super Bowl which is contested in either warm weather cities or inside of a domed stadium, these matchups are the most important NFL games which still involve the elements. With this Sunday’s games being played in New England and Green Bay, it’s clear that the elements will indeed be a factor.

How about last week’s games, specifically Sunday’s double-underdog uprising which was thrilling, stunning and shocking all at the same time.

Those words barely begin to scratch the surface of describing a Norv Turner-led team on the road without at times, Phil Rivers and LaDainian Tomlinson, upsetting Peyton Manning and the defending champion Colts. I didn’t see that game playing out any other way than a drubbing for Indy. I just didn’t. Even with San Diego up late, I figured Manning would buckle down and lead the Colts efficiently down the field for the winning score. Give the Chargers credit for exploding for some big plays on offence and putting the clamps on Indy late for the win.

The late game went as I wrote last week, although I was still surprised to see it play out. Dallas was flat (I’m sure Romo’s bye week off with Jessica Simpson in Cancun had nothing to do with it), and the Giants continued their inexplicable success on the road this year. Even more inexplicable may have been Terrell Owens’ post-game tearful meltdown defending Tony Romo, given how well he typically gets along with his quarterbacks….

Anyhoo, don’t hold your breath waiting for the underdogs to pull out victories this weekend - the Milton Sports Guy sees both favourites easily advancing to what would be a classic Super Bowl between America’s team (and QB), Favre and the Packers, and America’s villains, the undefeated juggernaut Patriots.

On to the picks (Home team in CAPS)

NEW ENGLAND (-14) over San Diego

I think we can all agree that New England will win this one outright - the question is the spread. 14 is a lot of points to give, especially in an AFC Championship game. It would be a tough decision if the Chargers were healthier - Rivers seems doubtful and LaDainian Tomlinson may not play the whole game. A Norv Turner/Billy Volek-led team with LT at far less than 100% on the road at the 17-0 Patriots? That’s not even factoring in my other rule that you never take the warm weather team on the road vs. a cold weather team. This has blowout written all over it - but again, that’s what I thought last week. Somehow the Turner/Volek combo teamed up for some huge plays and San Diego’s D came up big as well in the clutch. Then there’s New England who aren’t the same unstoppable force they were early in the season. In recent weeks, the Eagles, Ravens, Giants and Jags have given them a real challenge. Teams are figuring out that if you double-team Moss and avoid crucial turnovers, you have a chance. Ahhh, now there’s the key: “crucial turnovers.” This is what I predict will be the difference. With no LT and Volek more than likely leading the offence in the frigid conditions, you have to think the Patriots will force at least two Charger turnovers that will swing the game in their direction or turn a close game into a laugher. Therefore, I’ll try my chances once again taking the Pats to cover the big spread. I think Jacksonville was a tougher opponent than San Diego and they won by 11 last week, so 14 isn’t out of the question against this banged-up bunch.

GREEN BAY (-7) over N.Y. Giants

Although Eli Manning and the Giants have been unconscious on the road all season, and they’re fresh off a huge win vs. a bitter rival, don’t forget the roll that Brett Favre and the Packers are on… Even after finding themselves down by 14 early in last week’s game didn’t phase them, as they went on to outscore the Seahawks 42-6 from that point on. As I mentioned last week, the Packers are a team that can get a lead and then extend it. Also, Favre is a great cold weather QB while Eli Manning has admitted that he hates playing in the cold. And it promises to be cold in Green Bay on Sunday. Don’t you have to think that this road winning streak the Giants have going has to end at some point?? I think this is the week it all falls apart for the G-men. Imagine this scenario: the Packers get the ball, march down the field and score a TD. Now it’s 7-0, and Eli runs out there with his hands in his pockets and his teeth chattering. They hand off twice, and his third throw flies over Amani Toomer’s head and nearly kills Green Bay’s equipment manager. As he’s running off the field with his teeth chattering, Fox cuts to Archie Manning sitting in the stands with one of those, “I should have smacked him around more when he was little” looks on his face. Then they cut to Favre on the Packers sidelines, who’s standing there with a big grin and thinking, “Holy crap, this is gonna be easier than I thought.” All of that doesn’t seem too far-fetched now, does it.

And the juicy matchup between Favre and the Packers and the 18-0 Patriots will be set. If that’s how this plays out, this year’s Super Bowl will be one for the ages.

Now Milton, what do you think?

The Milton Sports Guy breaks down the NFL Divisional Playoffs

Saturday, January 12th, 2008

Favre and the Packers take on Hasselbeck and the Seahawks

4 intriguing matchups are on tap for this weekend, including the Seahawks venturing into the unfriendly confines of Lambeau Field to take on the Pack.

NFL Divisional Playoff Picks (Home Team in CAPS)

GREEN BAY (-7.5) over Seattle

As a Seahawk fan, I get the feeling this one is going to sting. A matchup with the Packers at Lambeau reminds me of 2004 (I believe) when the Seahawk/Packers Wild Card matchup went to OT. The Seahawks won the coin toss and the cameras caught Matt Hasselbeck’s humble response: “We’re taking the ball and we’re gonna score!” before trotting back to the sidelines. He prompty threw an interception which was returned for the winning touchdown. Not good. Let’s hope Mr. Hasselbeck has left his crystal ball back in Seattle this week.

I’d love to see my Seahawks stroll into Lambeau and escape with a gritty, hard fought narrow victory and advance to the NFC final, but it’s just not going to happen. Two years removed from an MVP season and leading his team to the Super Bowl, Shaun Alexander has all but disappeared and has become a non-factor. His backup, known in Seattle as ‘Triple M’ (Mediocre Maurice Morris) is hardly the answer, so the Seahawks are NOT running the ball. Then there’s the nagging injuries to D.J. Hackett and Deion Branch. Do you feel even remotely confident that the Seahawks could come from behind vs. Favre and the Pack? Neither do I.

Let’s look at Green Bay. They’ve won their last seven games by 11, 34, 14, 11, 31, 19 and 21 points. You know what that tells me? That they can protect and expand a lead.

The Seahawks were fortunate to beat a 9-7 Redskins team - why would anyone think they can hang with a 13-3 team on the road when they haven’t had a good road win all season? Besides, we have a team that never gets calls (Seattle) going against the current America’s Team (the Packers). No official wants to be the one who made the iffy call that screwed up Brett Favre’s storybook season. Come on.

The Pack will win this one in a romp.

NEW ENGLAND (-13) over Jacksonville

The Jags have become everyone’s sexy pick this postseason. I’ve noted in this column before that SI’s Peter King himself believes the Jags are New England’s biggest playoff threat this year. Built like a northern team with a solid running game, the Jaguars at a glance do seem like they could give the Patriots a real fight, especially in the cold and snow of Foxboro in January.

Well, I’m going to buck the trend a little. I think the Patriots have re-grouped after some close games toward the end of the season as the pressure of an undefeated regular season began to wear on them. I think they’ll come out this weekend refreshed and firing on all cylinders and I’m going with them to cover.

Let’s also remember last week, when the Jaguars were lucky to escape Pittsburgh with the win, after some shaky coaching decisions from the Steeler sideline. The Steelers dropped 19 points on the Jags in about five seconds last weekend once they started chucking the ball every down and I think we can agree that the Patriots’ passing game is a leeeetle bit better than the Steelers’. Another factor against Jacksonville is the fact that the weather will be quite balmy for New England in January. A cold, snowy, muddy surface may have evened the field a little…

Here are a couple of other stats to chew on:

• Belichick’s playoff record in New England: 14-2
• Brady’s playoff record at home: 6-0
• Belichick’s record against Jack Del Rio: 3-0
• New England’s lifetime record against Jacksonville: 7-1
• New England’s 2007 regular-season record: 16-0
• Number of ‘07 Patriots wins by 14-plus points: 11
• Record of ‘07 Jags after falling behind by more than seven points: 0-4

Take the Pats to win big.

INDIANAPOLIS (-8) over San Diego

With the exception of the rain-soaked Sunday night victory over a depleted Indy team, San Diego has shown consistently that they take too long to get going against every other quality opponent, falling behind to New England by 24, Green Bay by 10, Jacksonville by 14, Tennessee by 14 and Tennessee by six in the playoffs. Why would Round 2 be any different?

Here’s how I see this one playing out: Indy comes out like gangbusters at home, Phil Rivers looks lost, Norv Turner looks shellshocked, LaDainian Tomlinson sulking by the second quarter and eventually, the Chargers roll over and play dead. You can’t fall behind to the Colts in Indy unless you have Tom Brady and Randy Moss on your team.

For the Chargers to win this, their defence will have to chip in big-time by scoring at least 14 points and I just don’t see it.

From my point of view, you gotta go with Dungy and Manning at home in this one.

N.Y. Giants (+7.5) over DALLAS

My first instinct was to go with the Giants because as divisional rivals, they always seem to play Dallas tough. I also like the way Eli Manning has been playing of late, and they’re a strong road team.

Then, I swung to the Cowboys thinking of their potent offence, the fact that they’re at home and looking to prove their top-ranked NFC status, and maybe because the Giants are going to pull the ‘ol ‘one good game and then roll over and call it a season’ playoff routine we see so often (see last year’s Seahawks, and soon to be this year’s Seahawks).

Now, thinking about how the Cowboys’ offence revolves around big plays (see: Romo, Tony passing to Owens, Terrell), I’m a little concerned about T.O.’s injury. Will he be at 100%? Probably - he’s a big game performer, but the Cowboys’ offense doesn’t look so imposing anymore, and their collective limp to the finish looms as an enormous red flag. Maybe taking the Giants and the points doesn’t look so bad anymore….

Then, consider these points: as I mentioned, they played them tough in the previous two games, (hey, don’t I need one underdog covering in Round 2?), Eli seems to look better on the road than at home, and could the wave of Giants’ running backs eventually wear Dallas down?

Move to coaching and who inspires more confidence, Tom Coughlin or, ahem, Wade Phillips?

That last sentence alone makes me feel even more shaky about the Cowboys and I have to take the points. The Giants could even win this game outright and I think they will with a late field goal.

Go with the New York Football Giants.

Okay, those are my picks - take ‘em to the bank. Now Milton, what do you think?

Wildcard weekend according to the Milton Pigskin Prognosticator

Thursday, January 3rd, 2008

Jacksonville visits Pittsburgh this weekend

Wild card weekend always features intriguing matchups and this year is no different. Are the Jacksonville Jaguars more of a cold-weather team than the Steelers? We’ll find out Saturday night when the Jags visit Heinz Field where they’ve already beat the Steelers once this year.

4:30pm Saturday
SEATTLE (-3.5) over Washington
When looking at how these teams compare statistically you see no major advantage for either team as you have Seattle’s middle of-the-pack-ranked offense against the Skins’ similarly ranked defense (9th overall against 12th overall) and the Skins’ 15th-ranked offense against the Seahawks’ 15th-ranked defense.

Record: Seattle 10-6, Washington 9-7

League Rankings:
Offense – Overall: Seattle 9th, Washington 15th
Offense – Passing : Seattle 8th, Washington 14th
Offense – Rushing: Seattle 20th, Washington 12th
Defense – Overall: Seattle 15th, Washington 8th
Defense – Passing: Seattle 19th, Washington 16th
Defense – Rushing: Seattle 12th , Washington 4th

Here are the factors that more clearly favour the home team Seahawks:

1. In their last meeting Seattle beat Washington 20-10 in the 2005 playoffs, and did so after losing 2005 MVP RB Shaun Alexander to injury in the 1st quarter.

2. Playoff experience – the Seahawks are heading to the playoffs for their 5th straight season (including a Super Bowl appearance just 2 years ago) – this is a much bigger advantage than some may think – the “playoff jitters” will not be an issue for this veteran team.

3. Game experience – Washington lost their starting QB in week 14 to a knee injury, in comes Todd Collins, who had not started a game for NINE SEASONS – sure he’s been great (winning all 4 of his starts and throwing 5 TD’s with no INT’s) however it’s always harder in the playoffs and especially when it’s your first time and on the road, not to mention facing the 4th best pass rushing team (45 sacks this season – with Patrick Kerney leading the way).

4. Playing on Empty – not only have the Redskins had to deal with the murder of their team mate, which can be motivating but is also a very exhausting process to deal with, they also are coming off 3 straight weeks of “win or face elimination” games against the Giants, Vikings and Cowboys – so these two factors combined are more than likely going to result in a Redskin team with no gas left in their tank – watch for adrenaline to get them through the first quarter or two, but I predict Seahawk domination for the second half of this match.

8:00pm Saturday
Jacksonville (-2) over PITTSBURGH
Hats off to the odds-makers for having the balls to make Jacksonville the favourite for this game, as it is more than warranted, as conventional odds-makers would have incorrectly favoured Pittsburgh.

Here’s some of the key reasons why Jacksonville is the FAR superior team:

1. Pittsburgh finished the regular season at 10-6, but they had an INCREDIBLY soft schedule – I have mentioned this in several of my past weekly predictions, but finally took the time to tally this information today: an incredible 10 of their 16 games were against teams that finished the season with losing records (finishing a less than dominating 7-3 against these teams) while they had a lacklustre record of 3-3 against teams with records of .500 or better. Meanwhile, Jacksonville comes from one of the best two divisions in the league, as only their AFC South division along with the NFC East finished with all 4 teams at .500 or better – meaning they played 6 divisional games against legitimate teams – and for the AFC South, 3 of the 4 teams made the playoffs (Indy, Jacksonville and Tennessee) with only 8-8 Houston on the outside looking in.

2. With the incredibly soft schedule that benefited the Steelers this year all of their team rankings are very tainted – their #1 league defensive ranking is largely thanks to playing 10 of their games against poor teams, so the Jags offensive and defensive rankings are much more earned and more comparable to Pittsburgh than the numbers indicate:

Record: Pittsburgh 10-6, Jacksonville 11-5

League Rankings:
Offense - Overall: Pittsburgh 17th, Jacksonville 7th
Offense – Passing: Pittsburgh 22nd, Jacksonville 17th
Offense – Rushing: Pittsburgh 3rd, Jacksonville 2nd
Defense – Overall: Pittsburgh 1st, Jacksonville 12th (only a difference of 16.8 versus 19 p.p.g. allowed)
Defense – Passing: Pittsburgh 3rd, Jacksonville 15th
Defense – Rushing: Pittsburgh 3rd, Jacksonville 11th

3. Pittsburgh has several injury concerns going into this game, including having lost 2 of their starting offensive linemen to injury in the past 3 weeks, giving a further advantage to the Jags defense. The Steelers also lost their leading rusher (RB Willie Parker, 1316 yards this season) a few weeks ago.

4. Recent history also favours the Jags who have won the last 3 meetings versus the Steelers, including their only meeting this season in week 15 when they won 29-22 and had possession of the ball for almost 75% of the game – very dominating!

5. So often the team with fewer errors is the team that wins in the NFL, and this also benefits Jacksonville – they finished the regular season at +9 (9 more takeaways than giveaways) while Pittsburgh finished at +3. Likewise Jags QB Garrard finished with an impressive TD to Int ratio of 18-3 while Steeler pivot Rothlisberger finished at 32-11.

The only hope for the Steelers is playing at home and having the advantage of starting a QB with much more playoff experience than the Jags QB – but that simply ain’t enough to get the job done.

1:00pm Sunday
TAMPA BAY (-3) over New York Giants
Like Jacksonville (above) the Giants come from a strong division, with three of four teams going to the playoffs (Dallas, NYG and Washington) and the only team not advancing finishing an admirable 8-8 (Philadelphia). Meanwhile the Bucs’ NFC South continues to be a very curious division with the team to win the division having been last place the previous year for the past 3 or 4 seasons, and this season all other NFC South teams finished under .500. Regardless of this fact the Bucs had a much needed shot in the offensive arm this year w

GTA Recycling: Pitching plans for waste disposal

Thursday, January 3rd, 2008

Halton Recycling

A recycling plant that’s key to Toronto’s new garbage strategy has closed unexpectedly, throwing part of the city’s ambitious trash diversion plans into limbo.

The Canadian Polystyrene Recycling Association in Mississauga announced it was suspending operations just two weeks after Toronto began rolling out its mega blue bins.

The large-capacity blue boxes were purchased to accommodate the addition of polystyrene and plastic bags to the residential recycling program next fall. All Toronto homes will have one by spring.

The closing has also sent Peel Region and Hamilton, which already recycle these materials, scrambling to find alternatives. These plastics may end up being sent to landfills.

Foamed polystyrene, a plastic resin, is used for food containers and packaging electronic equipment.

While the total weight of polystyrene tossed out by GTA residents is small, the volume is huge. One kilogram of polystyrene packaging fills more than two household garbage bins. Hamilton collects about 3,000 kilograms a year.

The plant, the only recycler in the province big enough to take Toronto’s expected volume of polystyrene, had just invested $300,000 in state-of-the-art sorting equipment. But in a statement, the company cited declining revenues as the reason operations were halted.

“Our polystyrene market just went south,” said Steve Whitter, Toronto’s director of transfer, processing and disposal of solid waste. “Obviously it’s a setback.

“When Toronto gets into something like film plastic or polystyrene, they will very quickly swallow up all the available capacity that’s in the marketplace because we’re just so much bigger than everyone else.”

For now, the city intends to accept polystyrene and seek another market. “Normally, there’s a backup,” said Whitter. “Someone comes out of the woodwork who’s interested in taking the material if there’s a need, and there’s clearly a need.”

The closed plant has been recycling Peel’s polystyrene for years.

Its failure is “indicative of the whole issue” of plastics recycling, said Andy Pollack, Peel’s director of waste management. He said companies should only use plastic packaging if they can ensure markets are in place to recycle it. Last year, only 20 per cent of Ontario’s plastic packaging was recycled.

“Municipalities are at the end of the line. We have to manage what packagers and retailers decide to use so we’re constantly trying to figure out – out of all this plastic packaging – what is recyclable and what’s not,” he said. “It’s a big challenge for us.”

Cities can’t add items to the blue box mix that don’t have a market at the other end. “Someone out there has to say, `I’m a company that recycles plastic and I’m willing to take this type of plastic.’”

In two years, Michigan’s landfills will close to Ontario garbage, and all regions need to grapple now with ways to reduce, reuse and recycle. Forty to 50 per cent of all waste in the GTA, including organics, yard waste and recyclables, is diverted from landfills, but municipalities hope to increase that to 60 to 70 per cent in a few years.

Toronto has an ambitious diversion plan underpinned, ironically, by its purchase of a landfill near St. Thomas, Ont. – an investment that clarified for city officials how important it is to keep waste in check.

“If we simply continue to use (the St. Thomas landfill) at the current rate, it will fill up by 2024,” said solid-waste manager Geoff Rathbone. With the new diversion plan, the city can use the landfill it bought for $220 million for another 10 years, until 2034.

That’s why the city wanted to add high-volume polystyrene and bags to its program in the first place. “We’re given a certain number of million cubic metres to fill, and then it’s full,” Rathbone said.

The city is also introducing a pay-as-you-go plan that will force residents who put out bigger volumes of garbage to pay more. It plans to build two new processing centres for organics, six new reuse centres and a mixed-waste processing plant. The project, still in its infancy, would treat waste to reduce it before it goes to landfill.

Not everyone is ready to follow. Durham officials considered building a mixed-waste processing plant, but a tour of a Dutch operation convinced them otherwise.

“Think of breaking open bags of garbage and then spinning them around, trying to extract the odd bits and pieces that might be recyclable,” said works commissioner Clifford Curtis. “It’s almost an inhuman place to work. We went in and we might as well have thrown our clothes away when we got out. The smell got in everything.”

Curtis also has had doubts about adding plastic bags and foam to Durham’s blue box program.

“There are just some things that we can’t recycle because there is no market for it, such as plastic film and polystyrene foam,” he said. The bags are used to make plastic lumber, but “it’s a really, really thin market and it’s not stable,” he said.

The two items are also difficult to sort at the recycling plant. Foam breaks up easily and often clings to other material because of its static properties, while bags fly around and are difficult to pull manually from fast-moving conveyor belts.

Though Peel has been taking plastic bags for years, the region is starting a campaign to persuade residents not to put loose bags into the box. In plants with automated machinery, the bags get wrapped around anything that is spinning, so they’re a constant maintenance issue, said Pollack, who would like to see retailers collect bags instead.

Despite the challenges, Curtis thinks the next two years will be “a time of great opportunity.”

“People are finally grasping the concept that we can’t keep throwing our garbage into the ground and they are trying to divert to save resources. And people are willing to pay a premium to do that,” he said.

“They are trying to do the right thing. I think that’s very encouraging.”

RECYCLING ACROSS THE GTA: PLANS BY REGION

Peel Region

Has a 20-year contract with Algonquin Power in Brampton, the only residential waste incinerator in the province. The privately owned company incinerates half its garbage, with the remainder currently going to the Pine Tree Acres landfill in Michigan. Once that’s closed, the region’s garbage will go to Warwick Landfill near Sarnia, Ont. An environmental assessment approved the landfill’s expansion. Its use is still waiting on a certificate of approval, which should come in the next two years.

Halton Region

Hopes to reach 60 per cent diversion by 2010. Increased diversion rates will extend the life of the Milton landfill by seven years, until 2030.

In April, it will add a green cart program for food waste. Blue box collection will change from every two weeks to weekly. Garbage collection will change from weekly to every other week.

Durham Region

The region wants to build an energy-from-waste facility, similar to Algonquin Power in Brampton, which incinerates half of Peel’s garbage and creates electricity. The proposal, slated for a site in Clarington, Ont., near Oshawa, is undergoing environmental assessment. “It’s theoretically possible, if everything goes right, to be ready by 2010,” says Clifford Curtis, works commissioner in Durham Region.

York Region

The region is building a plant in Vaughan that will turn garbage into energy pellets, which Andy Campbell, York’s director of waste management, says look like dense goose droppings. The pellets can be burned in boilers, approved for use in Ontario greenhouses.

The region is also investing in Durham Region’s proposal for an energy-from-waste plant.

Written by Patti Winsa of the Toronto Star