Archive for June, 2007

Leafs stuck in neutral

Wednesday, June 27th, 2007

“Ok, and welcome to the executive level here in the Air Canada Centre offices. On the left is Raptor GM and President, Bryan Colangelo’s office, and further up the hall, right between that large, non-descript rock and another room we like to call ‘the hard place,’ you will see Leaf GM John Ferguson Jr.’s office.”

– Air Canada Centre tour guide.

That’s right folks. With the confusing moves made by my beloved Leafs this offseason, I can only think they’re stuck in between the proverbial rock and hard place… Don’t blame JFJ though – I think the direction (or quite obviously, the lack thereof) comes directly from the top.

How else do you explain the re-signing of captain Mats Sundin to play yet another year in the centre of the hockey universe – yet another year surrounded by talent inferior to his, even now in his mid-thirties and breaking down quickly? How else do you explain, for the second year in a row, they re-signed the lumbering, fragile, indifferent Kazakh Nik Antropov – the second year in a row they’ve had a chance to walk away from Pat Quinn’s pet project? How else do you explain the trading of two draft picks (one at #13) in a solid draft year for another project (Mark Bell) and a goaler (Vesa Toskala) to replace the one so “valuable” that he was traded for last year and promptly signed to a 3-year contract coming off a year in which he played himself right off the roster of his previous club? Oh, and the new netminder, although good, has never been quite good enough to rise up to the level of NHL starter as of yet, at age 30.

When JFJ arrived, I thought it was a good thing. It was time to end the Pat Quinn era of building teams full of aging, broken-down vets past their prime with their only playoff success largely coming at the expense of the Ottawa Senators. It was time to build up the scouting staff, draft well, cut some fat and begin to re-tool the mighty Leafs into a young, up-and-coming team which would contend seriously and consistently for the next decade. He had just built the Blues into just such a franchise. Stocked with young, feisty, aggressive players, they had been at or near the top of the league for several seasons (conveniently, let’s not mention their playoff failures). Instead, although apparently he’s bolstered the scouting staff, and some Leaf ‘prospects’ have finally found their way onto NHL ice, we’re seeing the same moves that ‘ol cinder-block-head would have made. This can mean only one thing – JFJ is not trusted, and the powers that be are calling the shots. This is not good for JFJ, or the long-suffering, high-paying fans of the Leafs.

When a club misses the playoffs for consecutive seasons, you’d think it would be time to change things up. Something’s not working – get rid of a few guys, make a trade or two to get younger and free up cap space to give yourselves some flexibility – you know, rebuild, re-tool, whatever. JFJ’s moves so far, as well as his one-year contract extension, tell me that he’s scrapped his ‘build for the future’ plan, for the ‘just get into the playoffs as the 8th seed’ plan. He’s trying to save his job. I can’t say I blame him, but what we’re looking at here is probably a carbon copy of last year’s Leaf club. Good, but nowhere near great, just missing the playoffs, some nice improvement from a few younger players, but a weak farm system with no 2007 high draft picks to add to the mix.

With rumours swirling around that the Leafs are trying to acquire a high-profile hockey mind to serve as an executive equal to the Raptors’ Colangelo, it certainly seems as if JFJ’s days are numbered. You would think a Bowman (who’s already denied the alleged Leaf offer), Muckler (a possibility), Lamoriello or Burke (no chance in hell to acquire either of these guys, but they’re the top guys I’m sure Toronto would be after) would either hire their own guy if not take on the GM’s responsibilities themselves. This means that the only option for Ferguson is to halt the re-building in an effort to line the coffers of MLSE with some playoff dough and try to save himself in the process. Trading say, Mats Sundin for young players and picks, and parting ways with a guy like Antropov to clear out space for a younger player to fill don’t do him any good. It’s not going to do the Leafs any good either, unless you consider the financial benefits they seem to be reaping in extending their 40-year Stanley Cup drought, leading along the restless, passionate, eager Leaf Nation by their wallets.

So there the franchise, its GM, and we, the fans sit – right in that office on the executive floor at the ACC. The one down the hall from Bryan Colangelo.

Not a good spot to be.

Is NHL Hockey Coming Close to Milton?

Friday, June 15th, 2007

I’ve been following the plight of the Nashville Predators with great interest over the past few weeks since Research in Motion’s CEO Jim Balsillie agreed to a deal in principle to purchase the team from Wisconsin businessman Craig Leipold. On the record, Bettman, Balsillie and Balsillie’s lawyers have refused to say anything but that the team will remain in Tennessee. Leipold was the only one to suggest the loophole in the team’s current lease that would allow them to leave as early as next season if they fail to average 14,000 butts in the seats for the season.

The saga was probably the most interesting story during an otherwise dull Stanley Cup final between Ottawa and Anaheim, with the Ducks quite easily copping the cup in 5 rather ho-hum matches. A week after the season ended, it’s not losing any momentum. A day after the announcement of the pending sale of the franchise, it was reported Balsillie had purchased 27 acres of land near Cambridge; this was followed up this week by word of the usual “save the [insert franchise name in peril here] season ticket drive” by die-hard Preds fans in an attempt to show the evil, greedy Canadian businessman that pro hockey really can work in Nashville; and in turn that move was followed up by Balsillie accepting deposits through ticketmaster for “Hamilton Predaors” season tickets after extending an existing agreement with Copps Coliseum.

The way I see it, it’s a pretty simple equation: unfortunately for the good fans of Nashville, if the sale goes through, this team is coming to Southern Ontario. NOT Kansas City, NOT Vegas, NOT Winnipeg, NOT anywhere else. Balsillie is an Ontario businessman and has no interest in operating a team long-term anywhere else. Why do you think he immediately backed out when the NHL wouldn’t finalize the Pens deal without language in the contract to keep the team in Pittsburgh? Don’t kid yourselves - he’s done his homework and wouldn’t be going through with this (and overpaying handsomely) unless it’s pretty much a done deal…

What Balsillie has done by paying such an exorbidant sum for this team, is make it almost impossible for the NHL to say no. Why? The other owners, including Bettman may be annoyed at his arrogance through all of this – but he just made all of them some serious coin by driving up franchise values, which you have to think were steadily dropping with the lack of positive media coverage in the U.S.

The NHL has also admitted this week that expansion is on their radar. Expansion means that big money is going to be lining the pockets of NHL owners soon. The inflated price at which Balsillie plans to acquire the Predators means that expansion fees are going to be in the $160 million range because of this $220-240 million sale. Expanding to two more teams at that cost means 30 owners splitting $320 million - without Balsillie joining ‘the club’, you’d have to think the fees would be $20-$40 million less.

Also, no matter how angry he is at Balsillie for showing him up, there is no way that Bettman is going to block this sale after Leipold has been losing millions owning this franchise over its 10 years of existence. What’s he going to say? “Just hang in there Craig - you’ll get a local offer sooner or later.” I don’t think so. What message does that send to other owners looking to get out, trying to maximize their profits? If Bettman and the Board inexplicably do try to block the sale, again, I have to assume Balsillie has done his homework and this thing will be settled in court – in his favour.

Overall, this is a good thing for the NHL - again no, I’m sure they’re not impressed by Balsillie securing Copps Coliseum, buying land in Cambridge and selling seasons tickets for the Hamilton Preds (all of the aforementioned seems to be a ploy to discourage the ticket-buying fans in Nashville so they don’t meet the minimum season ticket requirements, I think), but there’s no way in hell the league turns this down. I feel sorry for the rabid, new hockey fans and kids in Nashville, but here’s the truth: the NHL will have zero, I repeat, zero negative effects from losing Nashville as a hockey market. What – is NBC going to pay less for the rights to broadcast NHL hockey now? (they pay exactly zero dollars, remember). Is Versus going to demand Nashville have a team in order to maintain their (laughable) ratings? The fact is, Canada is carrying the NHL right now (TV-wise and profitability-wise), and Southern Ontario can easily support another team. Winnipeg? Quebec City? I still don’t think so. I think each of those cities would still struggle gaining enough corporate support (especially Quebec City – oh yeah, and they don’t have a suitable arena…). Southern Ontario with a large, increasing population, strong economy and actual real hockey fans, is a no-brainer.

Hamilton is only temporary – Kitchener/Waterloo/Cambridge is the perfect location and the ultimate destination for this franchise – lots of people, lots of corporate money (including Toronto businesses shut out of the Leafs) and guess what - it’s just out of both the Leafs’ and Sabres’ 80km veto range. Not only would they draw from the tri-cities, but from along the 401 corridor from London to Mississauga, and of course, Hamilton. What does this mean for Miltonians? Well, if Balsillie did indeed purchase the 27 acres outside of Cambridge to build a state-of-the-art RIM Centre, we could be 20 minutes on the 401 away from an NHL franchise…. That may just be enough to trade in my blue and white jersey for one with a big sabre-tooth tiger on the front…

It’s laughable however, to suggest the Leafs would be negatively impacted by this (they’ll be embarrassed more than anything now as the third best Ontario team) - the Sabres will take a hit, but I think Western New York will step up in the absence of a few Ontario fans (many from Hamilton and Niagara will keep going to Sabres games - it won’t be easy to get tickets for a new Hamilton team). Again, sorry Preds fans - I feel for you, as I did for Canadian cities that unfairly were robbed of NHL, NBA and Major League Baseball franchises. I feel bad for the die-hards and especially the kids that have started playing hockey in Tennessee that I keep hearing about. Those people probably think they deserve a team, but this is business. No matter how hard this is for you Nashville, I think it still pales in comparison to the tragedy of the Jets leaving Winnipeg, MLB ’stealing’ the Expos to force them into an unfit D.C. market, and what is known by even most American basketball experts as the “worst trade in NBA history:” Vancouver for Memphis.

As a resident of the Greater Toronto area, specifically Canada’s fastest growing city over the last five years, I’m looking forward to attending the “Hamilton/Cambridge/Kitchener/Waterloo/Ontario Predators” games in the coming years with my son. After living through the Ballard years as well as the recent post-lockout era as a Leaf fan, I’ve realized that things will never change. That franchise is flawed from its ownership on down. They’re not in it to win a Stanley Cup. It’s not a fluke that almost every other franchise in the league has been to a cup final since the Leafs last made the final (their last victory in 1967). The recent re-signings of players like McCabe, Sundin and Antropov only reinforce this belief (that’s a blog for another day – soon). I would love for my son to grow up cheering for the “Predators” and their renegade owner. An owner who aggressively decided it was time to end the failed U.S. hockey experiment and finally bring a team back to a market that actually cares about hockey (the last statement is not meant to be ‘American-bashing’ – these are the facts – teams like Atlanta, Florida and now Nashville have had their chance, but they’re failing. Simple as that. Hockey has always been a ‘niche’ sport in the U.S., very fragmented and regionalized - even in the original six days and during the 12-team league with 10 based in the U.S.).

If Balsillie gets his way, and again, I don’t think he’d be doing any of this unless he was pretty sure he could pull it off; you know what kind of an owner he’ll be. He’ll go after a championship hard and he will win one. For fans who’ve put up with the Leafs for decades, you will see what the real difference is between a club owned by a large corporation, and one owned by a hockey-mad maverick billionaire…

Fasten your seatbelts…

Does LOST have you Lost?

Thursday, June 7th, 2007

Wow. What a season of LOST we just witnessed. The finale had me riveted and felt more like a movie than a TV show. I’ve drifted in and out of the show at times, but the way this season unfolded kept me firmly planted to my living room couch. LOST producers: my big fat butt thanks you. It was probably a combination of two things: the writing and the scheduling.

Creatively, the show is simply getting more intriguing every week as things unfold. Just when you think you’re starting to figure out the big picture, you’re thrown a curve ball (see my current theory below, which admittedly, probably has a few holes as it stands now, and by the time episode 3 from season 4 airs, you might be able to discard it completely).

For me, the scheduling has also played a big part. I loved the new episodes every week to start the season, then re-runs for several consecutive weeks, then exclusively new shows leading up to the big finale. This helped keep me enthused about the show - I tuned out for a few weeks during re-run season, but the last few months have been intense. It’s easier to get into a show that follows a complex continuing storyline when you have some consistency - knowing you’re going to get brand new shows each week…. Well done.

Okay, now onto my theory. If you’re a little lost following LOST, this may help. As I said above, this theory could be blown out of the water by mid-September 2007, but for now, check it out and let me know what you think. I’ve perused various LOST theory sites and have come up with the following:

LOST is a grand Gedanken Experiment (German for Thought Experiment), a test of science and philosophy. It asks the question, What if time travel were not only possible, but real, with technology developed in a manner as realistic and consistent with known theoretical physics as possible? And to make it even more dramatic, What if you could travel back in time, and not know it? The passengers of Flight 815 have done exactly that, and the writers have made the audience go along with them, sharing the same sense of confusion and mystery.

Let’s talk about what we know about time travel today. We are not talking about cheesy movies of the past, where one can travel back to the age of dinosaurs or the middle ages. In fact, in the “real” science of time travel, a few things are known by the constraints of physics and quantum mechanics. There is a conceptual model of a real time machine, and it works something like this:

A time machine must have two parts, essentially two portals, connected by a wormhole (or black hole or whatever you want to call it). Door #1 is built alongside Door #2. Door #1 is allowed to continue along the “present” timeline, while Door #2 is encapsulated in a bubble within space-time, thus separated from the present timeline. This would require a great amount of energy and technology obviously unknown today… but thanks to the writers of LOST, it has been solved by Dharma Industries. The amount of separation would be only slight to begin with… say, 108 minutes. Since Door #1 exists in the present timeline, it can safely be located anywhere (Dharma headquarters?). Door #2, now operating in a different place in space-time, in the past, must be safely located in a remote location, for any type of interaction with it from the outside could be catastrophic.

Let’s go back to shortly after the turn of the Twentieth century, the days of Einstein and other early theoretical physicists. This was the dawn of the age of quantum mechanics, which provided new understanding and insight into physics at the sub-atomic level. New mathematics described the behavior of the tiny particles that make up all of matter in the universe. The math was clearly described in terms of numbers, symbols, formulas… however the application to nature as we know it was strange, weird, bizarre. It was very difficult to wrap the human brain around many of the concepts of quantum mechanics, and the math alone was inadequate to explain the problems. Thus, physicists and mathematicians turned to “Gedanken Experiments,” German for Thought Experiments. Applying the known concepts of quantum mechanics to situations in the “real world” allowed a conversation to take place in a way most anybody could (sort of) understand.

Before I lose you, here is an example. In the mathematics of quantum physics, time travel is theoretically possible. One of the most famous Gedanken Experiments is the Grandfather Paradox. If you could travel back in time, could you kill your grandfather? Logic tells you that no, you could not, for if you did, you would not exist. (Pause here and consider why Locke insists that “he can’t” kill his father, he needs somebody else to do it… though this is not a direct invocation of the Grandfather paradox.) The beautiful thing about Gedanken Experiments is that they are both scientific and philosophical, perfect fodder for a creative writer. In the case of the Grandfather Paradox, while they logic is clear, the actual experience of it is a mystery. Imagine actually standing there in the past, holding a loaded gun to the head of your grandfather… what would actually prevent you? “Something” would, some unknown mechanism of physics… and that is where the writers of LOST imagine for us. (Perhaps the Smokey Monster is the personification of this mysterious force.)

There is a very important concept in time travel here, which is that you can NEVER travel back further in time than the creation of your time machine; Hence the impossibility of visiting the dinosaurs, etc. Now, if the two doors of your time machine were separated by only 108 minutes at the initial “event”, but then allowed to just sit there, then both timelines would progress at the same pace, forever separated by only 108 minutes. Traveling to the past, but only by 108 minutes, would not be very interesting. Much more exciting would be to keep Door #2 back at the original time of its inception, while Door #1 continues to move forward in time. You could do this by continually “resetting” the clock on Door #2. Over time, the separation between the two doors would grow and grow, from minutes, to hours, to days, to years.

If you actually had the technology to achieve time travel in this manner, there are MANY profound questions you would have to test and answer in order to be confident that you could safely operate the time machine without catastrophically altering the future. The Grandfather Paradox is the most obvious, but actually only one of many questions.

Answer #1: What is the Dharma Initiative? It is the building and testing of a time machine, as described above. Door #1 is at the Dharma Headquarters, Door #2 is on the Island in the remote South Pacific (possibly underwater in the Looking Glass Station, which may explain why Juliet was brought to the island originally via submarine).

The question isn’t, Where is the Island? The question is, When is the Island? The answer to that depends on how long ago, in the present timeline, the time machine was created… let’s say 20 years ago?

Answer #2: Why must the button be pushed every 108 minutes? This “resets” the clock of Door #2 of the time machine, essentially holding it at the time of its inception in the relative past. If allowed to pass 108 minutes on the clock, then the time machine will lose the ability to reset itself. Furthermore, as the clock passes 108 minutes, you will witness and experience the initial event that activated the time machine… in reverse. Thus the activation of the magnet at the center of the machine, the purple sky, etc. Why, then, must it be pressed by a person, and not just programmed to reset itself? This is because the controllers at Door #1 do not have control over Door #2 in the past, and should disaster strike, and nobody is left alive in the past at Door #2, it should be allowed to pass 108 minutes and no longer reset. answer #3: What happened when the clock was allowed to pass 108 minutes? Door #2 of the time machine lost the ability to reset, and will now continue to progress along a timeline into the future, locked at approximately 20 years separation from Door #1.

What are some of the other critical questions, like the Grandfather Paradox, that must be answered when considering time travel? Here is a great one:

What if a childless woman travels back in time and conceives a child? Answer #4: a childless woman cannot travel to the past and conceive a child, because if she did, she would not have been a childless woman. In LOST, both mother and child die before the birth, thus preserving the timeline and laws of nature. Perhaps the Others do not fully understand this, and brought in fertility doctor Juliet to see if they can overcome this obstacle.

Consider another:

What if a child travels back to a time before he or she was born? Perhaps nothing… but what if the child dies in the past, before being born? Again, impossible. Answer #5: The Others abduct children on the Island to protect them at all costs, for they cannot allow the catastrophic violation of the laws of nature of a child dying before being conceived.

And yet another:

If you travel to the past, will you be the “you” of the present timeline when you arrive, or the younger “you” of the past, or some combination of the two? I do not know, but I believe this offers insight into why John Locke can walk on the Island despite being paralyzed. answer #6: Locke can walk not because the Island has powers to cure, but because he has traveled back to a time BEFORE he was ever paralyzed. He is somehow a blend of the Locke of the present and the Locke of the past.

Who is Ben? He obviously knows of the time machine, but was not the creator. The Others are his associates living in the time-space bubble around the Island and Door #2 of the time machine in the “past.” They are managing it and testing the effects of time travel, and strictly controlling who exits this bubble into the outside world.

How does one arrive at the Island? There are two methods of traveling to the site (and time) of the Island. First is the controlled method via Door #1 at Dharma Headquarters. It is not via plane, submarine, or any other traditional method of transportation.

The other method is in the accidental collision with the time-space bubble that surrounds the Island, as happened with Oceanic Flight 815, the Portuguese woman’s helicopter, etc. Despite the many theories that abound in online forums, the Others did not know that Flight 815 was coming or going to crash at the Island. It was a chance encounter. It was a disaster that created a paradox… what happens to a plane that crashes in the present, while entering the past? This leads to the question of whether the passengers are alive or dead, answered by talking about a cat.

Schrodinger’s cat, to be specific. Again, quantum mechanics can be very strange. One of the strangest behaviors in particle physics is known as Superposition, which is the ability of a particle to occupy two different states simultaneously (like up and down, left and right, here and there, etc.). In the world we know, you cannot be both here and there, but in particle physics, a world of probability, chance, and duality, you can. How can one imagine this? Another great Gedanken Experiment was conceived, as follows:

Place a cat in a sealed, steel box, along with a bottle of poison. In addition, a radioactive element is placed within the steel box. The decay of this radioactive element triggers a hammer, which breaks the bottle, releasing the poison and killing the cat. For the observer, outside of the box, you do not know when this radioactive decay happens. Because of the laws of Superposition, the radioactive element can occupy both states simultaneously, for the briefest moment. For that blink in time, the bottle is both broken and intact… the cat is both dead and alive, at the same time. This is a puzzle of science, but more important perhaps is the philosophical question of what does it mean to be both dead and alive?

Answer #7: The passengers of Oceanic Flight 815 are dead at the bottom of the ocean. AND they are ALIVE on the Island. They are both dead and alive. Since they are alive in the “past” of the Island’s timeline, can they return to the present in which they are dead? I guess that is the ultimate question that we will have to watch the show to find out.

A suggestion of an answer is found in Locke’s/Sawyer’s father. We were led to believe that he died in a car accident, and finds himself here on the Island. Of course he would think he’s in hell! We believe that somehow Locke “willed” him here, but that was actually never said on the show. In fact, Ben said to Locke, “you brought him here.” Perhaps what he means is this:

Answer #8: Locke’s father did not die in the accident. I believe that we will find soon that Locke is going to leave the Island. The question that nobody asked Locke’s father was when did the accident happen? See, Locke is going to return to the “present” timeline, and is going to pursue his father. He is going to find him, perhaps he is even going to cause his accident. He is going to drug and kidnap him, unable or unwilling to kill him by himself. He is somehow going to get him to Door #1 of the time machine and send him to the Island, where he already knows that Sawyer will kill him. Locke is going to “bring him here” to the Island… he just hasn’t done it yet. When he is on the “outside” in the present, why is he going to do this? Because he has to, because it is destiny… for on the Island, it has already happened. You know Locke loves destiny.

I could go on and on. Why is there a zoo with polar bears? Answer #9: The animals are on the Island for testing the effects of the various paradoxes associated with time travel. Perhaps another reason is that by keeping and preserving endangered animals, like polar bears, within this bubble in the past, there is a resource for their recovery should they become extinct in the future. Consider it a Noah’s Ark.

How do the Others know so much about the passengers of Flight 815? Answer #10: The Others have had perhaps years, with Dharma Industries in the present timeline at Door #1, to research each of the individuals, and transmit this information to the Island. To the audience and the survivors of 815, it seemed like the Others instantly knew about them. However, it likely required years of research to compile the files.

There are still mysteries that remain, and stories that we don’t know how they’ll play out. With this explanation, though, the behavior of The Others is understood. They must protect the timeline at all costs. That makes them seem evil to the survivors of 815, but in reality their intentions are to prevent catastrophe. My thought is that The Others, led by Ben, didn’t agree or see eye-to-eye with the Dharma folks for whatever reason (maybe The Others are actually “good” compared to the Dharma group), hence “the purge”. The Others now control the island, and the Portuguese woman who parachuted to the island is a Dharma member from the far future (explaining her radio transmitter being too advanced for Sayid to figure out) trying to connect with The Others and the Losties to either get them off the island, wipe them out, or both.

There are many other stories I haven’t touched, but they are all consistent with this basic theory. This includes Desmond’s apparent “time loop” he is experiencing and the theory that Jacob is really Jack: in the “flash-forward” in the season finale, it looks as though the Losties do indeed get off the island, but it was either at the “wrong time”, with the help of the “wrong people” or because of their unique situation, should never have left the island. Jack makes the comment to Kate in the flash-forward, that everyone is dying. This could be because they all should have died in the crash, but survived by inadvertendly entering the island’s time bubble. They get off the island, but they shouldn’t be able to exist off the island, so it’s possible that a series of “events” begin to take place, eliminating the Losties one by one (I LOVE the idea of the show possibly continuing with all of them back in 2004-2007 struggling to figure out what’s happening). It seems like Jack has figured out what’s happening, and that they weren’t meant to get off the island. This would explain the maps and flying across the South Pacific every weekend using his Golden Ticket… He’s trying to get back to the island. Maybe he eventually does (either via plane crash, parachute, or maybe even contacting Dharma or The Others) and goes too far back in time - way before the plane crash so he appears as Jacob, a strange, mythical figure to even Ben and The Others. This could explain why Jacob says to Locke “help me” before Locke tries to prevent Jack from getting to the radio tower…. We’ll see.

So there it is. Or, like I said - I’ll be on here editing this 5 minutes after the conclusion of the season 4 premiere. Time will tell.

Okay, now go ahead. I know you want to. Poke holes in this theory…. Tell me the producers specifically said that time travel wouldn’t be involved…. Tell me I’ve got it all wrong…

Or, feel free to agree.

Or, are you still LOST?

Good News for Underachievers Everywhere

Wednesday, June 6th, 2007

The following post was submitted by Capper:

Sounds like the Leafs are about to extend John Ferguson’s contract through 2009 and why shouldn’t they, what with his slick trades and their playoff success over the past few years - wait a minute, you say they haven’t made the post-season since the lockout?? You say they paid 5+ million for that tool McCabe?? Their top line is Antropov, Sundin and Ponikarovsky?? They signed Andrew Raycroft who was booed out of Boston and hadn’t played for a year to a guaranteed 3 year contract??

OOPS !!!!!!!!!!

I’m willing to put 10 pesos down on the fact that you’ll see Yashin in Toronto next year. The Islanders, despite all of their blunders have made possibly the best two moves of 2007 with that tool Millbury finally stepping out of the organization last week and this morning bought out Yashin’s remaining 4 years on his contract. Can you say we want to build our team around Ryan Smyth???

The only reason Ferguson is extended is because he can be the goat for all of the bad advice from Peddie.

When do the Kitchener RIMmers come to Ontario???………